Message-Id: <9605081527.AA24334@orion> To: "Daniel W. Connolly" <email@example.com> Cc: Charles Peyton Taylor <CTaylor@wposmtp.nps.navy.mil>, firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Re: HTML 3.2 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 07 May 1996 23:32:01 EDT." <m0uGzyr-0002U5C@beach.w3.org> Date: Wed, 08 May 1996 08:27:26 -0700 From: Mike Wexler <email@example.com> > >In http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/MarkUp/Wilbur, the DIV element is defined as: > > DIV document divisions > > Requires start and end tags. It is used with the ALIGN > > attribute to set the text alignment of the block of > > elements it contains. ALIGN can be one of LEFT, CENTER, or > > RIGHT. > > > >Why is there no mentioning of its structural purpose of grouping together > >related elements. > > I'm not sure. Dave put that write-up together in short order. > I'm sure he intends to revise it. Perhaps you could suggest some > wording? How about: DIV document divisions Groups related elements together. Can be used with the CLASS attribute to create meaningful document divisions such as Chapter, Section, and Sub-section. Can be used with ALIGN attribute to set the text alignment of the block of elements it conains. ALIGN can be one of LEFT, CENTER, or RIGHT. Requires start and end tags. > I think the issue of the CLASS attribute could be opened up. I agree. > We haven't decided whether putting CLASS in there will increase or > decrease confusion, since it doesn't have any observable effect in > many cases. It does have observable effects. HTML validation tools will whine about CLASS if it isn't part of the DTD. Scripts that process HTML will do different things with different classes of elements.