Re: Why a DTD for HTML 3.2? (fwd)

In message <2.2.16.19960522140957.3f4fdea0@pop.interaccess.com>, "Harold A. Dri
scoll" writes:
>
>>The proposed 3.2 DTD is an arbitrary subset of "current practice."  
>
>Yes, it is "an arbitrary subset," but certainly a considered subset. I think
>most of us would prefer a more "perfect" DTD. But that has not been
>forthcoming

On the other hand, I wouldn't mind seeing such a thing.

For example, I've hacked something up. See:

http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/MarkUp/html-pubtext/report/
(in the context of:

	http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/MarkUp/html-pubtext/
)

which is something I'd like to see used for technical reports
on the web. See also:

http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/MarkUp/SGML/spec-mgmt

Dan

Received on Wednesday, 22 May 1996 16:08:01 UTC