[Bug 13104] New: 1) ping(msg); //allow client to send server ping as per websocket spec 2) onpong(); //allow client to receive response of ping
CfC: publish Proposed Recommendation for Widget Digital Signature; deadline July 7
CfC: publish Proposed Recommendation for Widget Packaging and XML Configuration; deadline July 7
Publishing From-Origin Proposal as FPWD
[webstorage] Plan to move the spec to Last Call Working Draft
CfC: publish Last Call Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline July 7
[Bug 8241] Named properties on window
Component Model: Landing Experimental Shadow DOM API in WebKit
- Re: Component Model: Landing Experimental Shadow DOM API in WebKit
- Component Models and Encapsulation (was Re: Component Model: Landing Experimental Shadow DOM API in WebKit)
- Re: Component Models and Encapsulation (was Re: Component Model: Landing Experimental Shadow DOM API in WebKit)
- Re: Component Models and Encapsulation (was Re: Component Model: Landing Experimental Shadow DOM API in WebKit)
- Re: Component Models and Encapsulation (was Re: Component Model: Landing Experimental Shadow DOM API in WebKit)
- Re: Component Models and Encapsulation (was Re: Component Model: Landing Experimental Shadow DOM API in WebKit)
- Re: Component Models and Encapsulation (was Re: Component Model: Landing Experimental Shadow DOM API in WebKit)
- Re: Component Models and Encapsulation (was Re: Component Model: Landing Experimental Shadow DOM API in WebKit)
- Re: Component Models and Encapsulation (was Re: Component Model: Landing Experimental Shadow DOM API in WebKit)
- Re: Component Models and Encapsulation (was Re: Component Model: Landing Experimental Shadow DOM API in WebKit)
[widgets] What is the status and plan for Widget URI spec?
[widgets] Plan to get Widget Updates LC ready?
[Bug 13083] New: postMessage should have an optional parameter for a synchronous request. Cross-domain AJAX calls are enough of a problem that it merits a supported way of fixing it, and this could be it.
Re: [Widgets] Mozilla open apps
Re: Mutation events replacement
- Re: Mutation events replacement
- Re: Mutation events replacement
- Re: Mutation events replacement
- Re: Mutation events replacement
[indexeddb] openCursor optional parameters issue
- Re: [indexeddb] openCursor optional parameters issue
[Bug 13071] New: "Once the end of the file is reached, the user agent must dispatch the event one final time, as defined below" means an implementation may parse a partial (corrupt) event as a final event if the connection is interrupted. Spec should always require an exp
[Bug 13065] New: WindowTimers normatively referenced by not defined
[Bug 13064] New: WindowBase64 normatively referenced by not defined
[Bug 13063] New: MessagePort normatively referenced by not defined
Re: [XHR] setRequestHeader and redirects
[Bug 13020] No user agent will implement the storage mutex so this passage does not reflect reality
[Bug 13042] New: Define Event.timeStamp
[eventsource] Is Server-Sent Events ready for LC? ; deadline July 1
[widgets] VMMF, Meta Viewport, and Width and Height.
[indexeddb] Count property on IDBCursor
[Bug 13035] New: on http://www.w3.org/TR/css-print/#s.8.4 It seems this line: br { content: "\A" } is missing :before If I am wrong please update http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/generate.html#propdef-content thx
[indexeddb] Behavior when calling IDBCursor.continue multiple times
[indexeddb] IDBRequest.transaction property set to null
[indexeddb] IDBTransaction.oncomplete event type equals commit
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBTransaction.oncomplete event type equals commit
- RE: [indexeddb] IDBTransaction.oncomplete event type equals commit
[widget] technology/specification name
- Re: [widget] technology/specification name
Seeking pre-LC comments for Progress Events spec; deadline June 30
[Bug 12607] [HTML DOM][XMLHttpRequest object] Ass property so that: Do not follow location headers
[Bug 9903] Need to define specification and use of collations for string sorting
[cors] Content-Type
Testing Progress Events and CR
Help converting a WebSQL example to IndexDB
[Bug 12340] It is not clear which worker to use when using nameless SharedWorker
[Bug 12067] Improve error handling in workers
Re: [XHR2] load events on XMHttpRequestUpload
Re: [XHR2] final progress events
Re: [XHR2] timeout
UUID's
[Bug 11836] Don't specify the transport, just specify API and protocol
[widgets] Minor addition to P&C
Indicating certificate order in XML Dig Sig
Reminder: RfC: DOM 3 Events Last Call Working Draft; deadline June 28
[widgets] Reminder! RfC: LCWDs of Widget {Packaging, Interface, Digital Signature}; deadline June 28
RfC: moving Web Storage to WG Note; deadline June 29
- Re: RfC: moving Web Storage to WG Note; deadline June 29
- Re: RfC: moving Web Storage to WG Note; deadline June 29
- Re: RfC: moving Web Storage to WG Note; deadline June 29
- Re: RfC: moving Web Storage to WG Note; deadline June 29
[Bug 10337] add [Supplemental] support
[Bug 8241] Named properties on window
[Bug 8241] Named properties on window
how to implement the c# HttpListener with the CORS protocol
Mouse Lock
[Bug 12980] New: "Let origin be the ASCII serialization of the origin of the script that invoked the WebSocket() constructor, converted to ASCII lowercase." should probably say "entry script" like EventSource and other things do.
[Bug 11835] EventSource must support cross-domain requests (ala CORS)
CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Progress Events; deadline June 24
- Re: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Progress Events; deadline June 24
- Canceled! CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Progress Events; deadline June 24
[Bug 10623] Simplify Web IDL exceptions
Re: [Bug 12965] New: Problem: I want to perform DNS queries from a HTML5 app, but the networking functions available are too restrictive to build a stub resolver. Why: DNS is not just for machines - zones may contain extremely useful and rich informa
[Bug 12965] New: Problem: I want to perform DNS queries from a HTML5 app, but the networking functions available are too restrictive to build a stub resolver. Why: DNS is not just for machines - zones may contain extremely useful and rich information for humans too, e.g.
[indexeddb] Should deleteDatabase return IDBVersionChangeRequest?
RfC: DAP's Contacts API Last Call Working Draft; deadline July 14
- Re: RfC: DAP's Contacts API Last Call Working Draft; deadline July 14
- Re: RfC: DAP's Contacts API Last Call Working Draft; deadline July 14
Re: [whatwg] File API Streaming Blobs
[XHR][XHR2] Same-origin policy protection
RE: publish Last Call Working Draft of Web Workers; deadline March 7
[indexeddb] IDBIndex.getKey incorrect description.
[Bug 10640] Allow for non-nullable objects
[Bug 12947] New: Extend postMessage to support general transfer-of-ownership semantics
[Bug 12941] New: If I understand what I'm reading correctly, there's an error at the end of "A background number-crunching worker" tutorial. I think you mean "postMessage()" instead of "send()" in the sentence "To send a message back to the page, the send() method is used
Re: Some additions to Web Workers
[indexedb] IDBIndex.getKey incorrect description.
[Bug 11401] [IndexedDB] We should disallow .transaction() from within setVersion transactions
[Widgets] URI spec needs HTTP responses and dereferencing model
- Re: [Widgets] URI spec needs HTTP responses and dereferencing model
[webstorage] origin security check
- Re: [webstorage] origin security check
Re: [eventsource] Connection close on EventSource collection
[widgets] WARP tests
[Bug 12917] New: "deflate-stream" should be an optional extension when establishing a connection
- [Bug 12917] "deflate-stream" should be an optional extension when establishing a connection
- [Bug 12917] "deflate-stream" should be an optional extension when establishing a connection
- [Bug 12917] "deflate-stream" should be an optional extension when establishing a connection
[Bug 12916] New: Default values for code and reason when wasClean is false
[Bug 12914] New: close() should throw SYNTAX_ERR if the encoded reason string is too long (protocol supports up to 123 UTF-8 bytes)
[Bug 12913] New: Close() should throw the same exception as send() for unpaired surrogates
- Re: [Bug 12913] New: Close() should throw the same exception as send() for unpaired surrogates
- [Bug 12913] Close() should throw the same exception as send() for unpaired surrogates
[Bug 12912] New: Close status code is an unsigned short
- [Bug 12912] Close status code is an unsigned short
- [Bug 12912] Close status code is an unsigned short
Re: [Bug 12111] New: spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
- Re: [Bug 12111] New: spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
- Re: [Bug 12111] New: spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
- Re: [Bug 12111] New: spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
- Re: [Bug 12111] New: spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
- Re: [Bug 12111] New: spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
- Re: [Bug 12111] New: spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
- Re: [Bug 12111] New: spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
- Re: [Bug 12111] New: spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
- Re: [Bug 12111] New: spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
[Bug 11350] [IndexedDB] ObjectStores should have a way to hint that they're "evictable"
[widgets] RfC: LCWDs of Widget {Packaging, Interface, Digital Signature}; deadline June 28
[widgets] P&C Test suite: default locale
[websockets] Reintroducing onerror
[indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- RE: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- RE: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- RE: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- RE: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- RE: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- RE: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- RE: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
[File API: FileSystem] Removed mimeType from toURL
[Bug 11113] [IndexedDB] The spec should be more explicit about the queuing of setVersion transactions
WebApps-ISSUE-182 (OperationNotAllowed): File API introduces a new OperationNotAllowed exception where other specs have an error code [File API]
WebApps-ISSUE-181 (FileError-Name): Use case for FileError and FileException name attribute [File API]
- Re: WebApps-ISSUE-181 (FileError-Name): Use case for FileError and FileException name attribute [File API]
- Re: WebApps-ISSUE-181 (FileError-Name): Use case for FileError and FileException name attribute [File API]
[indexeddb] Using WebIDL Dictionary in IDBObjectStore.createIndex for optionalParameters
- Re: [indexeddb] Using WebIDL Dictionary in IDBObjectStore.createIndex for optionalParameters
- Re: [indexeddb] Using WebIDL Dictionary in IDBObjectStore.createIndex for optionalParameters
- Re: [indexeddb] Using WebIDL Dictionary in IDBObjectStore.createIndex for optionalParameters
- Re: [indexeddb] Using WebIDL Dictionary in IDBObjectStore.createIndex for optionalParameters
- RE: [indexeddb] Using WebIDL Dictionary in IDBObjectStore.createIndex for optionalParameters
- Re: [indexeddb] Using WebIDL Dictionary in IDBObjectStore.createIndex for optionalParameters
- Re: [indexeddb] Using WebIDL Dictionary in IDBObjectStore.createIndex for optionalParameters
- Re: [indexeddb] Using WebIDL Dictionary in IDBObjectStore.createIndex for optionalParameters
- RE: [indexeddb] Using WebIDL Dictionary in IDBObjectStore.createIndex for optionalParameters
- Re: [indexeddb] Using WebIDL Dictionary in IDBObjectStore.createIndex for optionalParameters
- RE: [indexeddb] Using WebIDL Dictionary in IDBObjectStore.createIndex for optionalParameters
- Re: [indexeddb] Using WebIDL Dictionary in IDBObjectStore.createIndex for optionalParameters
- RE: [indexeddb] Using WebIDL Dictionary in IDBObjectStore.createIndex for optionalParameters
- Re: [indexeddb] Using WebIDL Dictionary in IDBObjectStore.createIndex for optionalParameters
- RE: [indexeddb] Using WebIDL Dictionary in IDBObjectStore.createIndex for optionalParameters
- Re: [indexeddb] Using WebIDL Dictionary in IDBObjectStore.createIndex for optionalParameters
- Re: [indexeddb] Using WebIDL Dictionary in IDBObjectStore.createIndex for optionalParameters
- Re: [indexeddb] Using WebIDL Dictionary in IDBObjectStore.createIndex for optionalParameters
- Re: [indexeddb] Using WebIDL Dictionary in IDBObjectStore.createIndex for optionalParameters
[indexeddb] Section 4.1 - Opening the database (error codes)
Battery Status API vs. Geolocation API
Re: Request for feedback: DOMCrypt API proposal - random number generation
Warp tests
[Bug 12883] New: In section headed: Interpreting an event stream Step 4: "If the event name buffer has a value other than the empty string, change the type of the newly created event to equal the value of the event name buffer." I think you mean "change the *name*" rathe
[WARP] Not clear what blocking is
[Bug 10794] [IndexedDB] Clarify createObjectStore/removeObjectStore's tie to the database setVersion was called on
[Bug 12859] New: An IDL block for window.postMessage is lacking from the W3C spec.
Is Progress Events spec ready for Candidate Rec? [Was: Re: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Progress Events; deadline June 1]
CORS and HTTP headers spoofing
Re: Testing Requirements
Re: [Bug 12111] spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
- Re: [Bug 12111] spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
- Re: [Bug 12111] spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
CfC: publish a Candidate Recommendation of HTML5 Web Messaging; deadline June 9
Request for feedback: DOMCrypt API proposal
- Re: Request for feedback: DOMCrypt API proposal
- Re: Request for feedback: DOMCrypt API proposal
[widgets] WARP and redirects
[WARP] it's just too strict...
[WARP] error in spec
[widgets] P&C conformance requirement
[Bug 10640] Allow for non-nullable objects
[Bug 12111] spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
[Bug 10601] [IndexedDB] Need some way to create IDB events?
[Bug 12272] Improve section on DNS spoofing attacks to address user attacks
[Bug 12111] spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
[Bug 12090] WEB STORAGE It would be nice to have one Storage object that you could place wherever you want. You could simply set a parameter "local" or define it as "shared" and set path to the server (e.g. "http://www.mysite/shared_storage"). Cheers, Cam camoken@gm
Status of URL Interface?
[Bug 12838] New: Define garbage collection policy
[Bug 12837] New: Define unloading document cleanup steps
[IndexedDB] Evictable stores
[indexeddb] Auto-Generated Key Max Error
[Bug 12836] New: WorkerLocation lacks a strigifier
[indexeddb] Firing order for VERSION_CHANGE event (Bug# 12179)
RfC: DOM 3 Events Last Call Working Draft; deadline June 28
Update to Standards for Web applications on mobile
[widgets] TWI clarification
[Bug 12816] New: Make second argument in constructor an object for future extensibility
- [Bug 12816] Make second argument in constructor an object for future extensibility
- [Bug 12816] Make second argument in constructor an object for future extensibility
- [Bug 12816] Make second argument in constructor an object for future extensibility
[widgets] Widget Interface Test Suite
[Bug 12805] New: websocket.binaryType should be a string "blob" or "arraybuffer" for consistency with XHR
- [Bug 12805] websocket.binaryType should be a string "blob" or "arraybuffer" for consistency with XHR
[websockets] Constructor vs. open()
[Bug 12102] WebSocket protocol update time
[websockets] Binary support changes
on* attributes on DOM elements
[indexedDB] OptionalParameter question on IDBDatabase.createObjectStore
- Re: [indexedDB] OptionalParameter question on IDBDatabase.createObjectStore
[Bug 11834] API for send/receive of binary data? Current IETF protocol drafts have binary type. Consider typed arrays (ArrayBuffer).
[widgets] Plan to publish Proposed Recommendations for P&C, Interface and DigSig specs
CfC: publish a Last Call Working Draft of Widget Packaging and Configuration; deadline June 2
[widgets] Request to republish P&C
CfC: publish a Last Call Working Draft of The Widget Interface; deadline June 2
[widgets] Widgets Interface Spec ready for pub
[widgets] Dig sig tests regenerated
[widgets] Minor update to view mode P&C tests
[Bug 11673] Streaming audio data from a microphone over a WebSocket
[Bug 9786] WebIDL bugs in IndexedDB spec
Publishing a Last Call Working Draft of Web IDL on June 30
[indexeddb] Default direction of Cursors
CfC: publish a Last Call Working Draft of Widget Digital Signature; deadline May 30
[widgets] Dig Sig Spec ready for pub
[Bug 10640] Allow for non-nullable objects
[XHR2] responseType and response properties
[widgets]
[widgets] Widget Updates test case issue: ta-pr-005
Fwd: Heads up: Upcoming Last Call for Contacts API
[widgets] P&C Test Suite updates
[FileAPI] FileReader.abort() and File[Saver|Writer].abort have different behaviors
- Re: [FileAPI] FileReader.abort() and File[Saver|Writer].abort have different behaviors
- Re: [FileAPI] FileReader.abort() and File[Saver|Writer].abort have different behaviors
- Re: [FileAPI] FileReader.abort() and File[Saver|Writer].abort have different behaviors
App Cache and History API
[IndexedDB] IDBDatabase.transaction needs to specify exception for invalid mode parameter (Bug# 11406)
- RE: [IndexedDB] IDBDatabase.transaction needs to specify exception for invalid mode parameter (Bug# 11406)
request for custom clipboard types (Re: clipboard events)
- Re: request for custom clipboard types (Re: clipboard events)
- Re: risks of custom clipboard types
Filtering clipboard MIME types (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: Filtering clipboard MIME types (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: Filtering clipboard MIME types (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: Filtering clipboard MIME types (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: Filtering clipboard MIME types (was: Re: clipboard events)
safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
[IndexedDB] Bug# 11401 - We should disallow .transaction() from within setVersion transactions
CfC: publish new Working Draft of DOM Core; deadline May 21
Synchronous XMLHttpRequest and events
Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Progress Events; deadline June 1
Reminder: RfC: LCWD of HTML5 Web Messaging; deadline June 1
[widgets] WARP test suite gained two tests
[widgets] P&C test suite fixes
[Bug 12654] New: createIndex's options should include whether a field is optional/required
Inconsistency between IDBObjectStore.openCursor, IDBIndex.openCursor, and IDBIndex.openKeyCursor
- Re: Inconsistency between IDBObjectStore.openCursor, IDBIndex.openCursor, and IDBIndex.openKeyCursor
[widgets] WARP usability issue
Re: Overview of W3C technologies for mobile Web applications
- Re: Overview of W3C technologies for mobile Web applications
- Re: Overview of W3C technologies for mobile Web applications
[FileAPI] Updates to FileAPI Editor's Draft
- Publishing an update of File API spec
- Re: [FileAPI] Updates to FileAPI Editor's Draft
- Re: [FileAPI] Updates to FileAPI Editor's Draft
- Re: [FileAPI] Updates to FileAPI Editor's Draft
CfC: publish a new LCWD of DOM 3 Events; deadline May 18
Re: ISSUE-137 (IME-keypress): Should keypress events fire when using an IME? [DOM3 Events]
Re: Proposal: Navigation of JSON documents with html-renderer-script link relation
Re: clipboard events
SpellCheck API?
[Bug 12620] 5MB isn't enough
[Bug 12620] 5MB isn't enough
[Bug 12628] New: Web Storage feedback form doesn't work
[Web Sockets] Bug in Web Sockets API WebIDL
[WebIDL][Selectors-API] Stringifying null for DOMString attributes and properties
- Re: [WebIDL][Selectors-API] Stringifying null for DOMString attributes and properties
- Re: [WebIDL][Selectors-API] Stringifying null for DOMString attributes and properties
WebApps-ISSUE-179 (DOMException): DOM Core uses INVALID_STATE_ERR (DOMException) where D3E uses DISPATCH_REQUEST_ERR (EventException)
Re: [whatwg] Can we remove forminput and formchange events and related dispatch methods?
Concerns regarding cross-origin copy/paste security
- Re: Concerns regarding cross-origin copy/paste security
- Re: Concerns regarding cross-origin copy/paste security
widgets P&C rule 9.1.12...
Re: bug in example in step 6 of media type algorithm in WD-widgets-20110322 ?
Re: clarification on 9.1.3
Re: 'view-mode' Media Feature spec - corrections
[IndexedDB] deleteObjectStore method and updates to IDBDatabase.objectStoreNames on the client
- Re: [IndexedDB] deleteObjectStore method and updates to IDBDatabase.objectStoreNames on the client
[File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
[IndexedDB] Bug#11401 -We should disallow .transaction() from within setVersion transactions
[IndexedDB] Bug#10601 - Need some way to create IDB events?
copy events and content from server
- Re: copy events and content from server
- Re: copy events and content from server
- Re: copy events and content from server
Does WebApps want to do work in Model-driven Views area?
[indexeddb] result attribute for IDBRequest is set to undefined when calling IDBObjectStore.clear()
- Re: [indexeddb] result attribute for IDBRequest is set to undefined when calling IDBObjectStore.clear()
[widgets] Processing comments from 22-Mar-2011 LCWD of Widgets P&C
Proposal for a web application descriptor
Proposal for a web application descriptor
paste events and HTML support - interest in exposing a DOM tree?
- Re: paste events and HTML support - interest in exposing a DOM tree?
- Re: paste events and HTML support - interest in exposing a DOM tree?
- Re: paste events and HTML support - interest in exposing a DOM tree?
- Re: paste events and HTML support - interest in exposing a DOM tree?
- Re: paste events and HTML support - interest in exposing a DOM tree?
Re: [Bug 11606] New: wanted: awareness of non-persistent web storage
[Bug 12574] New: AbstractWorker and WorkerGlobalScope should inherit EventTarget
- [Bug 12574] AbstractWorker and WorkerGlobalScope should inherit EventTarget
- [Bug 12574] AbstractWorker and WorkerGlobalScope should inherit EventTarget
- [Bug 12574] AbstractWorker and WorkerGlobalScope should inherit EventTarget
- [Bug 12574] AbstractWorker and WorkerGlobalScope should inherit EventTarget
- [Bug 12574] AbstractWorker and WorkerGlobalScope should inherit EventTarget
- [Bug 12574] AbstractWorker and WorkerGlobalScope should inherit EventTarget
[IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- RE: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- RE: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- RE: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- RE: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
Global variables and id lookup for elements
Server-Side Events encoded in JSON
Server-Sent Event types
[webstorage] Plan to address open Bugs?
[workers] Processing comments from 10-Mar-2011 LCWD
- Re: [workers] Processing comments from 10-Mar-2011 LCWD
- Re: [workers] Processing comments from 10-Mar-2011 LCWD
[eventsource] Processing comments from the 10-Mar-2011 LCWD
Call for Test Suite Contributions (WebApps testing process now considered operational)
[Indexeddb} Bug # 9653 - nullable violations on parameters
- Re: [Indexeddb} Bug # 9653 - nullable violations on parameters
[widgets] Proposal to update Dig Sig spec; deadline May 3
Re: Widget URI tests
Re: [widgets] Widget Updates tests?
- Re: [widgets] Widget Updates tests?
Re: [widgets] missing tests?
[indexeddb] Cursor data Question
[indexedDB] transaction.objectStore(...) method question
[IndexedDB] which names can be the empty string?
Improving DOM Traversal and DOM XPath
Model-driven Views
- Re: Model-driven Views
- Re: Model-driven Views
- Re: Model-driven Views
- Re: Model-driven Views
- Re: Model-driven Views
- Re: Model-driven Views
- Re: Model-driven Views
- Re: Model-driven Views
[IndexedDB] Discrepancies with the Event type of error in section 4.12
- Re: [IndexedDB] Discrepancies with the Event type of error in section 4.12
[widgets] Dig Sig spec
No longer representing Opera
Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers
- Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers
- Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers
- Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers
- WebSocket feedback
- Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers
- Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers
- Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers
- Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers
- What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- RE: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers
- Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- RE: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- FW: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: FW: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: FW: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- FW: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- RE: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- RE: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
[widgets] Reminder: Last Call Working Draft of Widgets P&C; deadline May 1
[IndexedDB] Isolation mode -- edit
[XHR2] Blobs, names and FormData
- Re: [XHR2] Blobs, names and FormData
RE: [IndexedDB] Spec Question on IDBFactory open method
- Re: [IndexedDB] Spec Question on IDBFactory open method
- Re: [IndexedDB] Spec Question on IDBFactory open method
RE: Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web Workers; deadline April 21
- Re: Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web Workers; deadline April 21
- Re: Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web Workers; deadline April 21
- Re: Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web Workers; deadline April 21
- Re: Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web Workers; deadline April 21
- Re: Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web Workers; deadline April 21
- Re: Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web Workers; deadline April 21
- Re: Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web Workers; deadline April 21
[IndexedDB] Sync API for setVersion Changes
[IndexedDB] Exceptions in IDB and the DOMException
Overriding the MIME type in XHR2 after the request has started
CfC: server-sent-events
[Bug 12510] New: race condition: open before setting onopen
- [Bug 12510] race condition: open before setting onopen
- [Bug 12510] race condition: open before setting onopen
HTML5 Filesystem API feedback
Suggestion (redirection)
Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Server-sent Events; deadline April 21
Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web Workers; deadline April 21
Please use public-webapps-testsuite for testing discussions
CfC: WebApps testing process; deadline April 20
- Re: CfC: WebApps testing process; deadline April 20
- Re: CfC: WebApps testing process; deadline April 20
Re: Server Sent Events vs Web Sockets?
[FileAPI] Immutability and structured clones of File
[FileAPI] BlobBuilder.getBlob should clear the BlobBuilder
[FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
- Re: [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
Re: publish new Working Draft of Indexed Database API; deadline April 16
[Bug 10623] Simplify Web IDL exceptions
[Bug 10622] ECMAScript binding for exceptions
[FileAPI] FileWriter and read-only files
Re: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- RE: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- Re: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- Re: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- RE: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- Re: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- Re: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- RE: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- Re: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- RE: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- Re: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- RE: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- Re: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- RE: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- Re: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- Re: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- Re: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- RE: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- RE: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- Re: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- Re: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
[FileAPI] Seeking status and plan
Re: CfC: new WD of Clipboard API and Events; deadline April 5
- Re: CfC: new WD of Clipboard API and Events; deadline April 5
- Re: CfC: new WD of Clipboard API and Events; deadline April 5
Re: How many ways to save store app data?
[IndexedDB] Features not included in the first version of the spec
CfC: publish new Working Draft of Indexed Database API; deadline April 16
- Re: CfC: publish new Working Draft of Indexed Database API; deadline April 16
- Re: CfC: publish new Working Draft of Indexed Database API; deadline April 16
- RE: publish new Working Draft of Indexed Database API; deadline April 16
Support for matchesSelector()
- Re: Support for matchesSelector()
- Re: Support for matchesSelector()
- :scope definition ambiguity
- More questions about contextual reference nodes
[widgets] localizing author
Re: ISSUE-173 (ericu): terminal FileWriter progress events should be queued [File API: Writer]
[Bug 12438] New: Sync API for setVersion should specify a callback method and timeout value
CfC: publish new WD of WebSockets API; deadline April 13
[Bug 12433] New: Define which status code and reason to use in the close frame for close(), when navigating away, and when garbage collecting an open websocket
[websockets] What needs to be done before the spec is LC ready?
- Re: [websockets] What needs to be done before the spec is LC ready?
- RE: [websockets] What needs to be done before the spec is LC ready?
Web SQL Database specification
CfC: publish new WDs of File API: {Writer, Directories and System}; deadline April 11
Please use public-test-infra list for testharness.js discussions [Was: RfC: WebApps Testing Process]
[widgets] possible test errors for The Widget Interface?
[Bug 12411] New: eventsource: in "dispatch the event", step 3, looks like "Otherwise" is bogus and should be removed.
Selectors API IDL Issues
[Bug 12321] Add compound keys to IndexedDB
Re: Mail List Etiquette [Was: WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?]
Re: RfC: WebApps Testing Process
Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
How to standardize new Offline Web app features? [Was Re: Offline Web Applications status]
- Re: How to standardize new Offline Web app features? [Was Re: Offline Web Applications status]