- From: Daniel Cheng <dcheng@chromium.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 23:36:33 -0700
- To: "Hallvord R. M. Steen" <hallvord@opera.com>
- Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
- Message-ID: <BANLkTi=2pCsKZC5BOUpcb3z2vg__YwN+hg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 21:23, Hallvord R. M. Steen <hallvord@opera.com>wrote: > On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:39:13 +0900, Daniel Cheng <dcheng@chromium.org> > wrote: > > I'd go one step further and say that there should be some agreement on >> what >> MIME types ought to be supported to try to insure somewhat consistent >> behavior across different platforms. >> > > To get a table started in the spec, could you give me a small list of > (MIME) types one should mandate the UA to be aware of and be able to > "roundtrip" to/from native clipboard types? Just off the top of your head? > The typical Web MIME types would of course be something along the lines of > > text/plain > text/html > image/jpg > image/gif > image/png > application/xhtml+xml > image/svg+xml > > What about e.g. RTF? > > The way I'm working on implementing it >> (for drag and drop, though it applies to copy and paste as well), >> arbitrary >> strings would not be accessible from a non-DOM application, e.g. a native >> app like Word or Photoshop. Only a set of known MIME types would be >> automatically converted to the corresponding native type. >> > > That's dragging from UA to another app, right? So the way to spec it would > be "during copy/cut processing, the UA should support placing content of > these MIME types on the clipboard and translate the type to the OS native > equivalent where applicable" or something like that? > > When pulling data from the clipboard >>> >> <X> > >> I'm choosing >> to restrict the number of native types to a smaller, defined set that are >> visible to webpages. Any paths in this set can be filtered as necessary >> when a file drag is detected. >> > > Again the specific list of types for this would be great :-) > > -- > Hallvord R. M. Steen, Core Tester, Opera Software > http://www.opera.com http://my.opera.com/hallvors/ > http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2010-October/028926.htmlis a set of types I proposed originally. I omitted GIF/JPG because platform support for GIFs/JPGs isn't as strong, nor is it widely used. Daniel
Received on Tuesday, 17 May 2011 06:36:59 UTC