- From: Israel Hilerio <israelh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 23:37:07 +0000
- To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- CC: "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Israel Hilerio <israelh@microsoft.com> > wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > >> > >> Looks great to me. Remember that we need to make both .transaction > >> and .setVersion throw if called within the callback from either of them. > >> > >> / Jonas > >> > >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Israel Hilerio > >> <israelh@microsoft.com> > >> wrote: > >> > I've created a bug to outline a potential change to the Sync API to > >> > handle > >> the context for setVersion transaction inside a callback method. I > >> wanted to follow up with the group to see what other people's thought > >> about this change. The Bug has all the details for the proposed > >> change. The bug# is > >> 12438 [1]. > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > > >> > Israel > >> > > >> > [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12438 > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Good catch. What about adding the following to those two methods: > > > > New setVersion Exception: > > * The setVersion method needs to throw IDBDatabaseException with a > NOT_ALLOWED_ERR description when the setVersion method is called from > within the IDBTransactionCallback of a transaction method. > > > > New transaction Exception: > > * The transaction method needs throw IDBDatabaseException with a > NOT_ALLOWED_ERR description when the transaction method is called from > within the IDBTransactionCallback of a setVersion method. > > Both should say "within the IDBTransactionCallback of a transaction or > setVersion method", right? Or simply "within the IDBTransactionCallback". > > / Jonas Makes sense. I will add these descriptions to the bug and will coordinate with Eliot to make these changes/updates to the spec. israel
Received on Thursday, 21 April 2011 23:37:35 UTC