Thursday, 30 June 2011
- Re: Mutation events replacement
- Re: Mutation events replacement
- Re: Mutation events replacement
- Re: Mutation events replacement
- Re: Mutation events replacement
- Re: Mutation events replacement
- Re: Component Models and Encapsulation (was Re: Component Model: Landing Experimental Shadow DOM API in WebKit)
- Re: Component Models and Encapsulation (was Re: Component Model: Landing Experimental Shadow DOM API in WebKit)
- Re: Component Model: Landing Experimental Shadow DOM API in WebKit
- Re: Component Models and Encapsulation (was Re: Component Model: Landing Experimental Shadow DOM API in WebKit)
- Re: Component Models and Encapsulation (was Re: Component Model: Landing Experimental Shadow DOM API in WebKit)
- Re: Component Models and Encapsulation (was Re: Component Model: Landing Experimental Shadow DOM API in WebKit)
- Re: Component Models and Encapsulation (was Re: Component Model: Landing Experimental Shadow DOM API in WebKit)
- Re: Mutation events replacement
- Re: [indexeddb] openCursor optional parameters issue
- Re: Component Models and Encapsulation (was Re: Component Model: Landing Experimental Shadow DOM API in WebKit)
- Re: Component Model: Landing Experimental Shadow DOM API in WebKit
- Re: Component Models and Encapsulation (was Re: Component Model: Landing Experimental Shadow DOM API in WebKit)
- Re: Mutation events replacement
- Re: Mutation events replacement
- Re: Component Models and Encapsulation (was Re: Component Model: Landing Experimental Shadow DOM API in WebKit)
- RE: [indexeddb] openCursor optional parameters issue
- Re: Mutation events replacement
- Re: Mutation events replacement
- Re: Component Models and Encapsulation (was Re: Component Model: Landing Experimental Shadow DOM API in WebKit)
- Re: Mutation events replacement
- Re: [webstorage] Plan to move the spec to Last Call Working Draft
- Re: Mutation events replacement
- Re: Mutation events replacement
- Re: Mutation events replacement
- Re: Component Models and Encapsulation (was Re: Component Model: Landing Experimental Shadow DOM API in WebKit)
- Re: Component Model: Landing Experimental Shadow DOM API in WebKit
- Re: Component Models and Encapsulation (was Re: Component Model: Landing Experimental Shadow DOM API in WebKit)
- [Bug 13104] New: 1) ping(msg); //allow client to send server ping as per websocket spec 2) onpong(); //allow client to receive response of ping
- CfC: publish Proposed Recommendation for Widget Digital Signature; deadline July 7
- CfC: publish Proposed Recommendation for Widget Packaging and XML Configuration; deadline July 7
- Re: Publishing From-Origin Proposal as FPWD
- Re: Mutation events replacement
- Publishing From-Origin Proposal as FPWD
- Re: [widgets] Plan to get Widget Updates LC ready?
- [webstorage] Plan to move the spec to Last Call Working Draft
- Re: [widgets] Plan to get Widget Updates LC ready?
- Re: Mutation events replacement
- Re: [Widgets] Mozilla open apps
- Re: [widgets] What is the status and plan for Widget URI spec?
- Re: Mutation events replacement
- CfC: publish Last Call Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline July 7
- Re: Mutation events replacement
- Re: [Widgets] Mozilla open apps
- Re: Mutation events replacement
- Re: [XHR2] Blobs, names and FormData
- Re: [XHR2] Blobs, names and FormData
- Re: [XHR2] Blobs, names and FormData
- Re: [XHR2] Blobs, names and FormData
- Component Models and Encapsulation (was Re: Component Model: Landing Experimental Shadow DOM API in WebKit)
- [Bug 8241] Named properties on window
- Re: Mutation events replacement
- Re: Mutation events replacement
Wednesday, 29 June 2011
- Re: Component Model: Landing Experimental Shadow DOM API in WebKit
- Re: Mutation events replacement
- Re: Component Model: Landing Experimental Shadow DOM API in WebKit
- Re: Component Model: Landing Experimental Shadow DOM API in WebKit
- Re: [XHR2] Blobs, names and FormData
- Re: Component Model: Landing Experimental Shadow DOM API in WebKit
- Re: Component Model: Landing Experimental Shadow DOM API in WebKit
- Re: Component Model: Landing Experimental Shadow DOM API in WebKit
- Re: Component Model: Landing Experimental Shadow DOM API in WebKit
- Re: [XHR2] Blobs, names and FormData
- Re: Component Model: Landing Experimental Shadow DOM API in WebKit
- Re: [XHR2] Blobs, names and FormData
- Re: [XHR2] Blobs, names and FormData
- Re: [XHR2] Blobs, names and FormData
- Re: [XHR2] Blobs, names and FormData
- Component Model: Landing Experimental Shadow DOM API in WebKit
- Re: Indicating certificate order in XML Dig Sig
- Re: [XHR2] Blobs, names and FormData
- Re: [XHR2] Blobs, names and FormData
- Re: [XHR2] Blobs, names and FormData
- [widgets] What is the status and plan for Widget URI spec?
- [widgets] Plan to get Widget Updates LC ready?
- Re: Mutation events replacement
- Re: [widgets] Plan to publish Proposed Recommendations for P&C, Interface and DigSig specs
- Re: [Widgets] Mozilla open apps
- Re: [Widgets] Mozilla open apps
- W3C Community Groups and Business Groups [Was: Re: Proposal: Navigation of JSON documents with html-renderer-script link relation]
- [Bug 13083] New: postMessage should have an optional parameter for a synchronous request. Cross-domain AJAX calls are enough of a problem that it merits a supported way of fixing it, and this could be it.
- Re: [XHR2] Blobs, names and FormData
- Re: [indexeddb] openCursor optional parameters issue
Tuesday, 28 June 2011
- RE: [indexeddb] openCursor optional parameters issue
- Re: Indicating certificate order in XML Dig Sig
- Re: Mutation events replacement
- Re: [indexeddb] Count property on IDBCursor
- Re: [indexeddb] openCursor optional parameters issue
- Re: Indicating certificate order in XML Dig Sig
- Re: Mouse Lock
- RE: [indexeddb] IDBRequest.transaction property set to null
- Re: [Widgets] Mozilla open apps
- RE: [indexeddb] openCursor optional parameters issue
- Re: Mutation events replacement
- Re: Mutation events replacement
- Re: Mutation events replacement
- Re: [widget] technology/specification name
- Re: [widget] technology/specification name
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBRequest.transaction property set to null
- Re: [indexeddb] Behavior when calling IDBCursor.continue multiple times
- Re: [indexeddb] openCursor optional parameters issue
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBTransaction.oncomplete event type equals commit
- Re: Mouse Lock
Monday, 27 June 2011
- [indexeddb] openCursor optional parameters issue
- RE: [indexeddb] IDBTransaction.oncomplete event type equals commit
- RE: [indexeddb] Count property on IDBCursor
- Re: Indicating certificate order in XML Dig Sig
- [Bug 13071] New: "Once the end of the file is reached, the user agent must dispatch the event one final time, as defined below" means an implementation may parse a partial (corrupt) event as a final event if the connection is interrupted. Spec should always require an exp
- Re: RfC: moving Web Storage to WG Note; deadline June 29
- RE: RfC: moving Web Storage to WG Note; deadline June 29
- Re: RfC: DOM 3 Events Last Call Working Draft; deadline June 28
Sunday, 26 June 2011
- [Bug 13065] New: WindowTimers normatively referenced by not defined
- [Bug 13064] New: WindowBase64 normatively referenced by not defined
- [Bug 13063] New: MessagePort normatively referenced by not defined
- Re: [XHR] setRequestHeader and redirects
- Re: [XHR] setRequestHeader and redirects
Saturday, 25 June 2011
- Re: [XHR] setRequestHeader and redirects
- Re: [XHR] setRequestHeader and redirects
- Re: [XHR] setRequestHeader and redirects
- Re: [XHR] setRequestHeader and redirects
Friday, 24 June 2011
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- [Bug 13020] No user agent will implement the storage mutex so this passage does not reflect reality
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: Mouse Lock
- [Bug 13042] Define Event.timeStamp
- [Bug 13042] New: Define Event.timeStamp
- [eventsource] Is Server-Sent Events ready for LC? ; deadline July 1
- [widgets] VMMF, Meta Viewport, and Width and Height.
- Re: [widget] technology/specification name
- Re: [widget] technology/specification name
- Re: [widget] technology/specification name
- Re: [widget] technology/specification name
- [Bug 13035] on http://www.w3.org/TR/css-print/#s.8.4 It seems this line: br { content: "\A" } is missing :before If I am wrong please update http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/generate.html#propdef-content thx
- Re: [widget] technology/specification name
- RE: [widget] technology/specification name
- Re: [widget] technology/specification name
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: Testing Progress Events and CR
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: [indexeddb] Count property on IDBCursor
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: Mouse Lock
- [indexeddb] Count property on IDBCursor
Thursday, 23 June 2011
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- [Bug 12947] Extend postMessage to support general transfer-of-ownership semantics
- Re: [widget] technology/specification name
- [Bug 13035] New: on http://www.w3.org/TR/css-print/#s.8.4 It seems this line: br { content: "\A" } is missing :before If I am wrong please update http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/generate.html#propdef-content thx
- [indexeddb] Behavior when calling IDBCursor.continue multiple times
- [indexeddb] IDBRequest.transaction property set to null
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBTransaction.oncomplete event type equals commit
- [indexeddb] IDBTransaction.oncomplete event type equals commit
- Re: [XHR2] load events on XMHttpRequestUpload
- Re: [widget] technology/specification name
- Re: [widget] technology/specification name
- [widget] technology/specification name
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Seeking pre-LC comments for Progress Events spec; deadline June 30
- Canceled! CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Progress Events; deadline June 24
- Re: Testing Progress Events and CR
- Re: Testing Progress Events and CR
Wednesday, 22 June 2011
- Re: RfC: moving Web Storage to WG Note; deadline June 29
- [Bug 12607] [HTML DOM][XMLHttpRequest object] Ass property so that: Do not follow location headers
- RE: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- [Bug 9903] Need to define specification and use of collations for string sorting
- Re: RfC: moving Web Storage to WG Note; deadline June 29
- Re: RfC: moving Web Storage to WG Note; deadline June 29
- Re: [whatwg] File API Streaming Blobs
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: RfC: moving Web Storage to WG Note; deadline June 29
- Re: RfC: moving Web Storage to WG Note; deadline June 29
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: Testing Progress Events and CR
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: [cors] Content-Type
- Re: Testing Progress Events and CR
- [cors] Content-Type
- Testing Progress Events and CR
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: [widgets] WARP and redirects
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- [Bug 12574] AbstractWorker and WorkerGlobalScope should inherit EventTarget
- Re: Help converting a WebSQL example to IndexDB
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
Tuesday, 21 June 2011
- [Bug 12917] "deflate-stream" should be an optional extension when establishing a connection
- [Bug 12917] "deflate-stream" should be an optional extension when establishing a connection
- [Bug 12574] AbstractWorker and WorkerGlobalScope should inherit EventTarget
- [Bug 12917] "deflate-stream" should be an optional extension when establishing a connection
- [Bug 12980] "Let origin be the ASCII serialization of the origin of the script that invoked the WebSocket() constructor, converted to ASCII lowercase." should probably say "entry script" like EventSource and other things do.
- [Bug 12916] Default values for code and reason when wasClean is false
- [Bug 12913] Close() should throw the same exception as send() for unpaired surrogates
- [Bug 12914] close() should throw SYNTAX_ERR if the encoded reason string is too long (protocol supports up to 123 UTF-8 bytes)
- [Bug 12574] AbstractWorker and WorkerGlobalScope should inherit EventTarget
- [Bug 12912] Close status code is an unsigned short
- [Bug 12912] Close status code is an unsigned short
- [Bug 12574] AbstractWorker and WorkerGlobalScope should inherit EventTarget
- [Bug 12941] If I understand what I'm reading correctly, there's an error at the end of "A background number-crunching worker" tutorial. I think you mean "postMessage()" instead of "send()" in the sentence "To send a message back to the page, the send() method is used
- Help converting a WebSQL example to IndexDB
- [Bug 12836] WorkerLocation lacks a strigifier
- [Bug 12340] It is not clear which worker to use when using nameless SharedWorker
- [Bug 12067] Improve error handling in workers
- Re: [XHR2] final progress events
- Re: [XHR2] load events on XMHttpRequestUpload
- Re: [XHR2] load events on XMHttpRequestUpload
- Re: Publishing an update of File API spec
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- [Bug 12574] AbstractWorker and WorkerGlobalScope should inherit EventTarget
- [Bug 12574] AbstractWorker and WorkerGlobalScope should inherit EventTarget
- Re: [FileAPI] Updates to FileAPI Editor's Draft
- Re: Publishing an update of File API spec
- Re: RfC: moving Web Storage to WG Note; deadline June 29
- Re: Publishing an update of File API spec
- Re: WebApps-ISSUE-181 (FileError-Name): Use case for FileError and FileException name attribute [File API]
- Re: [FileAPI] Updates to FileAPI Editor's Draft
- Re: [FileAPI] Updates to FileAPI Editor's Draft
- Re: [XHR2] load events on XMHttpRequestUpload
- Re: [XHR2] final progress events
- Re: [XHR2] responseType and response properties
- Re: [XHR2] Overriding the MIME type in XHR2 after the request has started
- Re: RfC: moving Web Storage to WG Note; deadline June 29
- Re: [XHR2] timeout
- Re: RfC: moving Web Storage to WG Note; deadline June 29
- Re: Synchronous XMLHttpRequest and events
- Re: RfC: moving Web Storage to WG Note; deadline June 29
- Re: RfC: moving Web Storage to WG Note; deadline June 29
- Re: RfC: moving Web Storage to WG Note; deadline June 29
- Re: Publishing a Last Call Working Draft of Web IDL on June 30
- Re: UUID's
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- UUID's
- [Bug 12816] Make second argument in constructor an object for future extensibility
- [Bug 12883] In section headed: Interpreting an event stream Step 4: "If the event name buffer has a value other than the empty string, change the type of the newly created event to equal the value of the event name buffer." I think you mean "change the *name*" rathe
- [Bug 12965] Problem: I want to perform DNS queries from a HTML5 app, but the networking functions available are too restrictive to build a stub resolver. Why: DNS is not just for machines - zones may contain extremely useful and rich information for humans too, e.g.
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: RfC: moving Web Storage to WG Note; deadline June 29
- Re: RfC: moving Web Storage to WG Note; deadline June 29
- [Bug 11836] Don't specify the transport, just specify API and protocol
- Re: RfC: moving Web Storage to WG Note; deadline June 29
- Re: RfC: moving Web Storage to WG Note; deadline June 29
- Re: RfC: moving Web Storage to WG Note; deadline June 29
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: Mouse Lock
Monday, 20 June 2011
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: RfC: moving Web Storage to WG Note; deadline June 29
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: RfC: moving Web Storage to WG Note; deadline June 29
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: Mouse Lock
- [widgets] Minor addition to P&C
- Re: Indicating certificate order in XML Dig Sig
- Re: Indicating certificate order in XML Dig Sig
- Re: Indicating certificate order in XML Dig Sig
- Re: CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Progress Events; deadline June 24
- Indicating certificate order in XML Dig Sig
- Re: RfC: moving Web Storage to WG Note; deadline June 29
- Re: RfC: moving Web Storage to WG Note; deadline June 29
- Re: RfC: moving Web Storage to WG Note; deadline June 29
- Re: RfC: moving Web Storage to WG Note; deadline June 29
- Re: RfC: moving Web Storage to WG Note; deadline June 29
- Reminder: RfC: DOM 3 Events Last Call Working Draft; deadline June 28
- Re: RfC: moving Web Storage to WG Note; deadline June 29
- [widgets] Reminder! RfC: LCWDs of Widget {Packaging, Interface, Digital Signature}; deadline June 28
- Re: RfC: moving Web Storage to WG Note; deadline June 29
- RfC: moving Web Storage to WG Note; deadline June 29
- Re: [widgets] WARP and redirects
- Re: [widgets] WARP and redirects
- Re: [widgets] WARP usability issue
- Re: [widgets] WARP and redirects
- Re: [widgets] WARP usability issue
- [Bug 10337] add [Supplemental] support
Sunday, 19 June 2011
- [Bug 8241] Named properties on window
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: how to implement the c# HttpListener with the CORS protocol
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- [Bug 8241] Named properties on window
Thursday, 16 June 2011
Friday, 17 June 2011
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- [Bug 12980] New: "Let origin be the ASCII serialization of the origin of the script that invoked the WebSocket() constructor, converted to ASCII lowercase." should probably say "entry script" like EventSource and other things do.
- [Bug 11835] EventSource must support cross-domain requests (ala CORS)
- RE: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: [whatwg] on* attributes on DOM elements
- Re: [whatwg] on* attributes on DOM elements
- Re: on* attributes on DOM elements
- Re: [XHR2] Blobs, names and FormData
- CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Progress Events; deadline June 24
- [Bug 10623] Simplify Web IDL exceptions
- Re: [XHR2] Blobs, names and FormData
- Re: on* attributes on DOM elements
- Re: Is Progress Events spec ready for Candidate Rec?
- [Bug 12411] eventsource: in "dispatch the event", step 3, looks like "Otherwise" is bogus and should be removed.
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBIndex.getKey incorrect description.
- Server-Sent Events feedback
- Re: RfC: DAP's Contacts API Last Call Working Draft; deadline July 14
- RE: [indexeddb] Should deleteDatabase return IDBVersionChangeRequest?
- RE: [indexeddb] Using WebIDL Dictionary in IDBObjectStore.createIndex for optionalParameters
Thursday, 16 June 2011
- Re: [indexeddb] Should deleteDatabase return IDBVersionChangeRequest?
- Re: [indexeddb] Using WebIDL Dictionary in IDBObjectStore.createIndex for optionalParameters
- RE: [indexeddb] Using WebIDL Dictionary in IDBObjectStore.createIndex for optionalParameters
- Re: [Bug 12111] New: spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
- Re: [Bug 12111] New: spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
- Re: [Bug 12965] New: Problem: I want to perform DNS queries from a HTML5 app, but the networking functions available are too restrictive to build a stub resolver. Why: DNS is not just for machines - zones may contain extremely useful and rich informa
- Re: [Bug 12111] New: spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
- Re: RfC: DAP's Contacts API Last Call Working Draft; deadline July 14
- Re: RfC: DAP's Contacts API Last Call Working Draft; deadline July 14
- Re: [Bug 12965] New: Problem: I want to perform DNS queries from a HTML5 app, but the networking functions available are too restrictive to build a stub resolver. Why: DNS is not just for machines - zones may contain extremely useful and rich informa
- [Bug 12965] New: Problem: I want to perform DNS queries from a HTML5 app, but the networking functions available are too restrictive to build a stub resolver. Why: DNS is not just for machines - zones may contain extremely useful and rich information for humans too, e.g.
- RE: [indexeddb] Should deleteDatabase return IDBVersionChangeRequest?
Wednesday, 15 June 2011
- Re: [indexeddb] Should deleteDatabase return IDBVersionChangeRequest?
- [indexeddb] Should deleteDatabase return IDBVersionChangeRequest?
- Re: [XHR][XHR2] Same-origin policy protection
- Re: [XHR][XHR2] Same-origin policy protection
- RfC: DAP's Contacts API Last Call Working Draft; deadline July 14
- Re: [XHR][XHR2] Same-origin policy protection
- Re: [XHR][XHR2] Same-origin policy protection
- Re: [XHR][XHR2] Same-origin policy protection
- Re: [whatwg] File API Streaming Blobs
- [XHR][XHR2] Same-origin policy protection
Tuesday, 14 June 2011
- FW: publish Last Call Working Draft of Web Workers; deadline March 7
- RE: publish Last Call Working Draft of Web Workers; deadline March 7
- [indexeddb] IDBIndex.getKey incorrect description.
- Re: [FileAPI] Updates to FileAPI Editor's Draft
- Re: [webstorage] origin security check
- Re: [Bug 12111] New: spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
- Re: [Bug 12111] New: spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
- Re: [webstorage] origin security check
- Re: [Bug 12111] New: spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
- Re: [indexeddb] Using WebIDL Dictionary in IDBObjectStore.createIndex for optionalParameters
Saturday, 11 June 2011
Monday, 13 June 2011
- [Bug 10640] Allow for non-nullable objects
- Re: [indexeddb] Using WebIDL Dictionary in IDBObjectStore.createIndex for optionalParameters
- RE: [indexeddb] Using WebIDL Dictionary in IDBObjectStore.createIndex for optionalParameters
- Re: [webstorage] origin security check
- RE: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- RE: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- [Bug 12947] New: Extend postMessage to support general transfer-of-ownership semantics
- FW: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: CfC: publish a Candidate Recommendation of HTML5 Web Messaging; deadline June 9
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: [webstorage] origin security check
- Re: [webstorage] origin security check
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
Sunday, 12 June 2011
- Re: [Bug 12111] New: spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: [Bug 12111] New: spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
Saturday, 11 June 2011
- [Bug 12941] New: If I understand what I'm reading correctly, there's an error at the end of "A background number-crunching worker" tutorial. I think you mean "postMessage()" instead of "send()" in the sentence "To send a message back to the page, the send() method is used
- Re: [Bug 12111] New: spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
- Re: [Bug 12111] New: spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
- Re: [Bug 12111] New: spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
- Re: [Bug 12111] New: spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- RE: [IndexedDB] deleteObjectStore method and updates to IDBDatabase.objectStoreNames on the client
Friday, 10 June 2011
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: Offline Web Applications status
- RE: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- RE: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: Some additions to Web Workers
- Re: FW: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: FW: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- FW: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: [webstorage] origin security check
- Re: [webstorage] origin security check
- Re: [Bug 12111] New: spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
- Re: [Bug 12111] New: spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
- RE: [Bug 12913] New: Close() should throw the same exception as send() for unpaired surrogates
- Re: [webstorage] origin security check
- Re: [Bug 12913] New: Close() should throw the same exception as send() for unpaired surrogates
- Re: [Widgets] URI spec needs HTTP responses and dereferencing model
- Re: Proposal for a web application descriptor
- Re: [Widgets] URI spec needs HTTP responses and dereferencing model
- Re: [Widgets] URI spec needs HTTP responses and dereferencing model
- Re: [Widgets] URI spec needs HTTP responses and dereferencing model
- Re: [Widgets] URI spec needs HTTP responses and dereferencing model
- Re: [Widgets] URI spec needs HTTP responses and dereferencing model
- Re: [webstorage] origin security check
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- RE: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- RE: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: [Widgets] URI spec needs HTTP responses and dereferencing model
Thursday, 9 June 2011
- [indexedb] IDBIndex.getKey incorrect description.
- Re: [Widgets] URI spec needs HTTP responses and dereferencing model
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- [Bug 11401] [IndexedDB] We should disallow .transaction() from within setVersion transactions
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: [webstorage] origin security check
- Re: [WARP] error in spec
- [Widgets] URI spec needs HTTP responses and dereferencing model
- [webstorage] origin security check
- Re: [eventsource] Connection close on EventSource collection
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
Wednesday, 8 June 2011
- [widgets] WARP tests
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- RE: [websockets] Reintroducing onerror
- Re: [FileAPI] Updates to FileAPI Editor's Draft
- [Bug 12917] New: "deflate-stream" should be an optional extension when establishing a connection
- [Bug 12916] New: Default values for code and reason when wasClean is false
- RE: [websockets] Reintroducing onerror
- [Bug 12914] New: close() should throw SYNTAX_ERR if the encoded reason string is too long (protocol supports up to 123 UTF-8 bytes)
- [Bug 12913] New: Close() should throw the same exception as send() for unpaired surrogates
- [Bug 12912] New: Close status code is an unsigned short
- Re: [FileAPI] Updates to FileAPI Editor's Draft
- Re: [Bug 12111] New: spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- RE: [indexeddb] Default direction of Cursors
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- RE: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- RE: [IndexedDB] Evictable stores
- [Bug 11350] [IndexedDB] ObjectStores should have a way to hint that they're "evictable"
Tuesday, 7 June 2011
- Re: [indexeddb] Using WebIDL Dictionary in IDBObjectStore.createIndex for optionalParameters
- Re: [indexeddb] Using WebIDL Dictionary in IDBObjectStore.createIndex for optionalParameters
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: [FileAPI] Updates to FileAPI Editor's Draft
- Re: [indexeddb] Using WebIDL Dictionary in IDBObjectStore.createIndex for optionalParameters
- Re: [IndexedDB] Evictable stores
- Re: [widgets] P&C Test suite: default locale
- RE: [websockets] Reintroducing onerror
- Re: [widgets] P&C test suite fixes
- Re: [FileAPI] Updates to FileAPI Editor's Draft
- RE: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- RE: [indexeddb] Using WebIDL Dictionary in IDBObjectStore.createIndex for optionalParameters
- Re: [FileAPI] Updates to FileAPI Editor's Draft
- RE: [IndexedDB] Evictable stores
- RE: [websockets] Reintroducing onerror
- Re: [FileAPI] Updates to FileAPI Editor's Draft
- [widgets] RfC: LCWDs of Widget {Packaging, Interface, Digital Signature}; deadline June 28
- Re: [websockets] Reintroducing onerror
- [widgets] P&C Test suite: default locale
- [websockets] Reintroducing onerror
- Re: Is Progress Events spec ready for Candidate Rec? [Was: Re: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Progress Events; deadline June 1]
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- Re: [Indexeddb} Bug # 9653 - nullable violations on parameters
- [indexeddb] IDBDatabase.setVersion non-nullable parameter has a default for null
- RE: [Indexeddb} Bug # 9653 - nullable violations on parameters
- [File API: FileSystem] Removed mimeType from toURL
Monday, 6 June 2011
- Re: WebApps-ISSUE-181 (FileError-Name): Use case for FileError and FileException name attribute [File API]
- Re: [indexeddb] Using WebIDL Dictionary in IDBObjectStore.createIndex for optionalParameters
- Re: [indexeddb] Using WebIDL Dictionary in IDBObjectStore.createIndex for optionalParameters
- Re: [indexeddb] Using WebIDL Dictionary in IDBObjectStore.createIndex for optionalParameters
- Re: Request for feedback: DOMCrypt API proposal - random number generation
- [Bug 11113] [IndexedDB] The spec should be more explicit about the queuing of setVersion transactions
- Re: Request for feedback: DOMCrypt API proposal - random number generation
- Re: [indexeddb] Using WebIDL Dictionary in IDBObjectStore.createIndex for optionalParameters
- Re: Request for feedback: DOMCrypt API proposal - random number generation
- Re: WebApps-ISSUE-181 (FileError-Name): Use case for FileError and FileException name attribute [File API]
- Re: [indexeddb] Default direction of Cursors
- RE: Publishing an update of File API spec
- WebApps-ISSUE-182 (OperationNotAllowed): File API introduces a new OperationNotAllowed exception where other specs have an error code [File API]
- WebApps-ISSUE-181 (FileError-Name): Use case for FileError and FileException name attribute [File API]
- Re: [indexeddb] Section 4.1 - Opening the database (error codes)
- [indexeddb] Using WebIDL Dictionary in IDBObjectStore.createIndex for optionalParameters
- Re: Request for feedback: DOMCrypt API proposal - random number generation
- RE: [indexeddb] Default direction of Cursors
- Re: [indexeddb] Default direction of Cursors
- RE: [indexeddb] Default direction of Cursors
- Re: [indexeddb] Section 4.1 - Opening the database (error codes)
- [indexeddb] Section 4.1 - Opening the database (error codes)
- Re: Publishing an update of File API spec
- Publishing an update of File API spec
- Re: Status of URL Interface?
- Re: Battery Status API vs. Geolocation API
- Re: Battery Status API vs. Geolocation API
- Battery Status API vs. Geolocation API
- Re: Request for feedback: DOMCrypt API proposal
- Re: Request for feedback: DOMCrypt API proposal
Saturday, 4 June 2011
Friday, 3 June 2011
Sunday, 5 June 2011
Saturday, 4 June 2011
Friday, 3 June 2011
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- [Bug 12883] New: In section headed: Interpreting an event stream Step 4: "If the event name buffer has a value other than the empty string, change the type of the newly created event to equal the value of the event name buffer." I think you mean "change the *name*" rathe
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: Request for feedback: DOMCrypt API proposal
- Re: Testing Requirements
- Re: Request for feedback: DOMCrypt API proposal
- Re: Request for feedback: DOMCrypt API proposal
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- [widgets] WARP summary of issues, was Re: [WARP] error in spec
- Re: Testing Requirements
- Re: Testing Requirements
- Re: FW: CORS and HTTP headers spoofing
- Re: [WARP] error in spec
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- [WARP] Not clear what blocking is
- Re: Request for feedback: DOMCrypt API proposal
- FW: CORS and HTTP headers spoofing
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- [Bug 10794] [IndexedDB] Clarify createObjectStore/removeObjectStore's tie to the database setVersion was called on
- Re: Request for feedback: DOMCrypt API proposal
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: Request for feedback: DOMCrypt API proposal
- Re: CORS and HTTP headers spoofing
Thursday, 2 June 2011
- Re: Request for feedback: DOMCrypt API proposal
- Re: Request for feedback: DOMCrypt API proposal
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: CORS and HTTP headers spoofing
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: Request for feedback: DOMCrypt API proposal
- Re: Request for feedback: DOMCrypt API proposal
- RE: CORS and HTTP headers spoofing
- Re: [Bug 12111] spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: [Bug 12111] spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
- Re: [Bug 12111] spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
- Re: [Bug 12111] spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
- Re: [Bug 12111] spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
- Re: [Bug 12111] spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: [Bug 12111] spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
- Re: [Bug 12111] spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
- Re: [Bug 12111] spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
- Re: Status of URL Interface?
- [Bug 12859] New: An IDL block for window.postMessage is lacking from the W3C spec.
- Re: Testing Requirements
- Re: Status of URL Interface?
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: CORS and HTTP headers spoofing
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers
- Re: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- RE: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Is Progress Events spec ready for Candidate Rec? [Was: Re: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Progress Events; deadline June 1]
Tuesday, 31 May 2011
Thursday, 2 June 2011
- What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers]
- Re: Testing Requirements
- Re: Testing Requirements
- Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers
- Re: [WARP] error in spec
- Re: [WARP] error in spec
- Re: [Bug 12111] spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
- Re: Status of URL Interface?
- CfC: publish a Candidate Recommendation of HTML5 Web Messaging; deadline June 9
- Re: [WARP] it's just too strict...
Wednesday, 1 June 2011
Thursday, 2 June 2011
- [widgets] WARP and redirects
- [WARP] it's just too strict...
- [WARP] error in spec
- [widgets] P&C conformance requirement
- [Bug 10640] Allow for non-nullable objects
Wednesday, 1 June 2011
- Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers
- Re: [webstorage] Plan to address open Bugs?
- Re: [webstorage] Plan to address open Bugs?
- Re: Status of URL Interface?
- [Bug 12111] spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
- [Bug 10601] [IndexedDB] Need some way to create IDB events?
- Re: [webstorage] Plan to address open Bugs?
- [Bug 12272] Improve section on DNS spoofing attacks to address user attacks
- [Bug 12111] spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
- [Bug 12090] WEB STORAGE It would be nice to have one Storage object that you could place wherever you want. You could simply set a parameter "local" or define it as "shared" and set path to the server (e.g. "http://www.mysite/shared_storage"). Cheers, Cam camoken@gm
- Re: Status of URL Interface?
- Status of URL Interface?
- [Bug 12628] Web Storage feedback form doesn't work
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- RE: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Evictable stores
Tuesday, 31 May 2011
- [Bug 12838] New: Define garbage collection policy
- [Bug 12837] New: Define unloading document cleanup steps
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- [IndexedDB] Evictable stores
- Re: [indexedDB] OptionalParameter question on IDBDatabase.createObjectStore
- RE: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers
- [Bug 12816] Make second argument in constructor an object for future extensibility
- Re: [indexedDB] OptionalParameter question on IDBDatabase.createObjectStore
- Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers
- Re: [indexeddb] Auto-Generated Key Max Error
- Re: WebSocket feedback
- Re: WebSocket feedback
- [indexeddb] Auto-Generated Key Max Error
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBDatabase.transaction needs to specify exception for invalid mode parameter (Bug# 11406)
- WebSocket feedback
- [Bug 12805] websocket.binaryType should be a string "blob" or "arraybuffer" for consistency with XHR
- [Bug 12816] Make second argument in constructor an object for future extensibility
- [Bug 12836] New: WorkerLocation lacks a strigifier
- Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBDatabase.transaction needs to specify exception for invalid mode parameter (Bug# 11406)
- Re: [indexeddb] Firing order for VERSION_CHANGE event (Bug# 12179)
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBDatabase.transaction needs to specify exception for invalid mode parameter (Bug# 11406)
- RE: [IndexedDB] IDBDatabase.transaction needs to specify exception for invalid mode parameter (Bug# 11406)
- [indexeddb] Firing order for VERSION_CHANGE event (Bug# 12179)
- Re: [indexedDB] OptionalParameter question on IDBDatabase.createObjectStore
- RE: [indexedDB] OptionalParameter question on IDBDatabase.createObjectStore
- RfC: DOM 3 Events Last Call Working Draft; deadline June 28
- Re: Overview of W3C technologies for mobile Web applications
- Update to Standards for Web applications on mobile
- Re: [WebIDL][Selectors-API] Stringifying null for DOMString attributes and properties
Monday, 30 May 2011
- Re: [websockets] Binary support changes
- [widgets] new TWI test for preferences.clear(), was Re: [widgets] TWI clarification
- [widgets] TWI clarification
- Re: [websockets] Constructor vs. open()
- [Bug 12816] New: Make second argument in constructor an object for future extensibility
- Re: [websockets] Binary support changes
Sunday, 29 May 2011
Saturday, 28 May 2011
- [Bug 12805] New: websocket.binaryType should be a string "blob" or "arraybuffer" for consistency with XHR
- Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers
- Re: [websockets] Constructor vs. open()
- Re: [websockets] Binary support changes
- [websockets] Constructor vs. open()
- RE: [websockets] Binary support changes
- RE: [websockets] Binary support changes
Friday, 27 May 2011
- [Bug 12102] WebSocket protocol update time
- Re: [websockets] Binary support changes
- Re: [websockets] Binary support changes
- Re: [websockets] Binary support changes
- Re: [websockets] Binary support changes
- Re: [websockets] Binary support changes
- [websockets] Binary support changes
- Re: [indexedDB] OptionalParameter question on IDBDatabase.createObjectStore
- [Bug 12433] Define which status code and reason to use in the close frame for close(), when navigating away, and when garbage collecting an open websocket
- Re: [indexedDB] OptionalParameter question on IDBDatabase.createObjectStore
- on* attributes on DOM elements
- [indexedDB] OptionalParameter question on IDBDatabase.createObjectStore
- Re: [widgets] Widget Updates test case issue: ta-pr-005
- Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers
Thursday, 26 May 2011
- [Bug 11834] API for send/receive of binary data? Current IETF protocol drafts have binary type. Consider typed arrays (ArrayBuffer).
- [widgets] Plan to publish Proposed Recommendations for P&C, Interface and DigSig specs
- CfC: publish a Last Call Working Draft of Widget Packaging and Configuration; deadline June 2
- Re: [widgets] Request to republish P&C
- [widgets] Request to republish P&C
- Re: CfC: publish a Last Call Working Draft of The Widget Interface; deadline June 2
- CfC: publish a Last Call Working Draft of The Widget Interface; deadline June 2
- [widgets] Widgets Interface Spec ready for pub
- Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers
Wednesday, 25 May 2011
- [widgets] Dig sig tests regenerated
- Re: [widgets]
- Re: [widgets]
- [widgets] Minor update to view mode P&C tests
- [Bug 12510] race condition: open before setting onopen
Tuesday, 24 May 2011
- Re: [Web Sockets] Bug in Web Sockets API WebIDL
- [Bug 12510] race condition: open before setting onopen
- [Bug 11673] Streaming audio data from a microphone over a WebSocket
- [Bug 9786] WebIDL bugs in IndexedDB spec
- Publishing a Last Call Working Draft of Web IDL on June 30
- Re: [widgets]
- Re: [widgets]
- Re: CfC: publish a Last Call Working Draft of Widget Digital Signature; deadline May 30
- Re: [widgets] localizing author
- Re: [widgets] localizing author
- Re: clarification on 9.1.3
- Re: bug in example in step 6 of media type algorithm in WD-widgets-20110322 ?
- Re: [FileAPI] FileReader.abort() and File[Saver|Writer].abort have different behaviors
- Re: [FileAPI] FileReader.abort() and File[Saver|Writer].abort have different behaviors
- Re: [XHR2] responseType and response properties
Monday, 23 May 2011
- Re: [XHR2] responseType and response properties
- Re: [indexeddb] Default direction of Cursors
- Re: [XHR2] responseType and response properties
- Re: [FileAPI] FileReader.abort() and File[Saver|Writer].abort have different behaviors
- [indexeddb] Default direction of Cursors
- Re: [XHR2] responseType and response properties
- CfC: publish a Last Call Working Draft of Widget Digital Signature; deadline May 30
- Re: [widgets] Dig Sig Spec ready for pub
- Re: [widgets] Dig Sig Spec ready for pub
- [widgets] Dig Sig Spec ready for pub
- Re: [widgets]
- [Bug 10640] Allow for non-nullable objects
Sunday, 22 May 2011
Saturday, 21 May 2011
- [XHR2] responseType and response properties
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
Friday, 20 May 2011
Thursday, 19 May 2011
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: Filtering clipboard MIME types (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: Filtering clipboard MIME types (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: Filtering clipboard MIME types (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Fwd: Heads up: Upcoming Last Call for Contacts API
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- [widgets] P&C Test Suite updates
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: Filtering clipboard MIME types (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: copy events and content from server
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: copy events and content from server
- Re: clipboard events
Wednesday, 18 May 2011
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: Filtering clipboard MIME types (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: clipboard events
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: Filtering clipboard MIME types (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: Filtering clipboard MIME types (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: Filtering clipboard MIME types (was: Re: clipboard events)
Tuesday, 17 May 2011
- Re: Filtering clipboard MIME types (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: [FileAPI] FileReader.abort() and File[Saver|Writer].abort have different behaviors
- Re: [FileAPI] FileReader.abort() and File[Saver|Writer].abort have different behaviors
- Re: [FileAPI] FileReader.abort() and File[Saver|Writer].abort have different behaviors
- Re: [FileAPI] FileReader.abort() and File[Saver|Writer].abort have different behaviors
- Re: [FileAPI] FileReader.abort() and File[Saver|Writer].abort have different behaviors
- Re: [FileAPI] FileReader.abort() and File[Saver|Writer].abort have different behaviors
- [FileAPI] FileReader.abort() and File[Saver|Writer].abort have different behaviors
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- App Cache and History API
- Re: risks of custom clipboard types
- Re: risks of custom clipboard types
- [IndexedDB] IDBDatabase.transaction needs to specify exception for invalid mode parameter (Bug# 11406)
- Re: risks of custom clipboard types
- Re: risks of custom clipboard types
- Re: risks of custom clipboard types
- Re: Filtering clipboard MIME types (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: risks of custom clipboard types
- Re: Filtering clipboard MIME types (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: risks of custom clipboard types
- Re: risks of custom clipboard types
- Re: risks of custom clipboard types
- Re: risks of custom clipboard types
- Re: clipboard events
- Re: risks of custom clipboard types
- Re: Filtering clipboard MIME types (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: clipboard events
- Re: [IndexedDB] Bug# 11401 - We should disallow .transaction() from within setVersion transactions
- Re: [IndexedDB] Bug# 11401 - We should disallow .transaction() from within setVersion transactions
- Re: risks of custom clipboard types
- Re: risks of custom clipboard types
- Re: Filtering clipboard MIME types (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: risks of custom clipboard types
- Re: copy events and content from server
- Re: request for custom clipboard types (Re: clipboard events)
- Re: Filtering clipboard MIME types (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: request for custom clipboard types (Re: clipboard events)
- request for custom clipboard types (Re: clipboard events)
- Filtering clipboard MIME types (was: Re: clipboard events)
- safeguarding a live getData() against looping scripts? (was: Re: clipboard events)
- Re: paste events and HTML support - interest in exposing a DOM tree?
- Re: Concerns regarding cross-origin copy/paste security
- [IndexedDB] Bug# 11401 - We should disallow .transaction() from within setVersion transactions
- Re: copy events and content from server
Saturday, 14 May 2011
Friday, 13 May 2011
- Re: Synchronous XMLHttpRequest and events
- Re: Synchronous XMLHttpRequest and events
- Re: Synchronous XMLHttpRequest and events
- Re: Synchronous XMLHttpRequest and events
- Re: Synchronous XMLHttpRequest and events
- Re: Synchronous XMLHttpRequest and events
- Synchronous XMLHttpRequest and events
- Re: Overview of W3C technologies for mobile Web applications
- Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Progress Events; deadline June 1
- Reminder: RfC: LCWD of HTML5 Web Messaging; deadline June 1
- [widgets] WARP test suite gained two tests
- Re: Overview of W3C technologies for mobile Web applications
- [widgets] P&C test suite fixes
- [Bug 12654] New: createIndex's options should include whether a field is optional/required
- Re: Inconsistency between IDBObjectStore.openCursor, IDBIndex.openCursor, and IDBIndex.openKeyCursor
Thursday, 12 May 2011
- Inconsistency between IDBObjectStore.openCursor, IDBIndex.openCursor, and IDBIndex.openKeyCursor
- Re: [widgets] WARP usability issue
- Re: [widgets] WARP usability issue
- Re: [widgets] WARP usability issue
- Re: [widgets] WARP usability issue
- Re: [widgets] WARP usability issue
- Re: [widgets] WARP usability issue
- Re: [widgets] WARP usability issue
- Re: [widgets] WARP usability issue
- Re: [widgets] WARP usability issue
- [widgets] WARP usability issue
- Re: Overview of W3C technologies for mobile Web applications
- Re: Overview of W3C technologies for mobile Web applications
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
- Re: SpellCheck API?
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
- Re: Concerns regarding cross-origin copy/paste security
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
Wednesday, 11 May 2011
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
- Re: CfC: new WD of Clipboard API and Events; deadline April 5
- Re: SpellCheck API?
- [FileAPI] Updates to FileAPI Editor's Draft
- Re: SpellCheck API?
- Re: SpellCheck API?
- CfC: publish a new LCWD of DOM 3 Events; deadline May 18
- Re: SpellCheck API?
- Re: ISSUE-137 (IME-keypress): Should keypress events fire when using an IME? [DOM3 Events]
- Re: Proposal: Navigation of JSON documents with html-renderer-script link relation
- Re: [widgets] Dig Sig spec
Tuesday, 10 May 2011
Wednesday, 11 May 2011
Tuesday, 10 May 2011
- Re: SpellCheck API?
- Re: SpellCheck API?
- Re: SpellCheck API?
- Re: Model-driven Views
- Re: SpellCheck API?
- Re: clipboard events
- Re: [WebIDL][Selectors-API] Stringifying null for DOMString attributes and properties
- Re: clipboard events
- Re: clipboard events
- Re: clipboard events
- Re: clipboard events
- Re: clipboard events
- Re: clipboard events
Monday, 9 May 2011
- Re: SpellCheck API?
- Re: clipboard events
- Re: clipboard events
- Re: [WebIDL][Selectors-API] Stringifying null for DOMString attributes and properties
- Re: SpellCheck API?
- Re: SpellCheck API?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: [WebIDL][Selectors-API] Stringifying null for DOMString attributes and properties
- Re: SpellCheck API?
- Re: SpellCheck API?
- SpellCheck API?
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
Sunday, 8 May 2011
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
Saturday, 7 May 2011
- Re: [WebIDL][Selectors-API] Stringifying null for DOMString attributes and properties
- Re: [WebIDL][Selectors-API] Stringifying null for DOMString attributes and properties
Friday, 6 May 2011
- [Bug 12620] 5MB isn't enough
- Re: paste events and HTML support - interest in exposing a DOM tree?
- Re: Model-driven Views
- Re: Model-driven Views
- [Bug 12620] 5MB isn't enough
- [Bug 12628] New: Web Storage feedback form doesn't work
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: [WebIDL][Selectors-API] Stringifying null for DOMString attributes and properties
- [Web Sockets] Bug in Web Sockets API WebIDL
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- [WebIDL][Selectors-API] Stringifying null for DOMString attributes and properties
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
Thursday, 5 May 2011
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- WebApps-ISSUE-179 (DOMException): DOM Core uses INVALID_STATE_ERR (DOMException) where D3E uses DISPATCH_REQUEST_ERR (EventException)
- RE: [IndexedDB] Bug#11401 -We should disallow .transaction() from within setVersion transactions
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
- Re: [widgets] localizing author
- Re: [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: [widgets] localizing author
- Re: copy events and content from server
Wednesday, 4 May 2011
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: Model-driven Views
- Re: [whatwg] Can we remove forminput and formchange events and related dispatch methods?
- Re: [indexeddb] result attribute for IDBRequest is set to undefined when calling IDBObjectStore.clear()
- RE: [indexeddb] result attribute for IDBRequest is set to undefined when calling IDBObjectStore.clear()
- Concerns regarding cross-origin copy/paste security
- Re: [indexeddb] result attribute for IDBRequest is set to undefined when calling IDBObjectStore.clear()
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: [IndexedDB] deleteObjectStore method and updates to IDBDatabase.objectStoreNames on the client
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: widgets P&C rule 9.1.12...
- RE: [indexeddb] result attribute for IDBRequest is set to undefined when calling IDBObjectStore.clear()
- Re: [widgets] Processing comments from 22-Mar-2011 LCWD of Widgets P&C
- widgets P&C rule 9.1.12...
- Re: bug in example in step 6 of media type algorithm in WD-widgets-20110322 ?
- Re: [widgets] localizing author
- Re: [IndexedDB] deleteObjectStore method and updates to IDBDatabase.objectStoreNames on the client
- Re: clarification on 9.1.3
- Re: 'view-mode' Media Feature spec - corrections
- Re: [widgets] localizing author
- RE: [IndexedDB] deleteObjectStore method and updates to IDBDatabase.objectStoreNames on the client
- Re: [widgets] Dig Sig spec
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: [IndexedDB] deleteObjectStore method and updates to IDBDatabase.objectStoreNames on the client
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: [indexeddb] result attribute for IDBRequest is set to undefined when calling IDBObjectStore.clear()
- [IndexedDB] deleteObjectStore method and updates to IDBDatabase.objectStoreNames on the client
- RE: [IndexedDB] Bug#10601 - Need some way to create IDB events?
- [File API: FileSystem] Path restrictions and case-sensitivity
Tuesday, 3 May 2011
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Bug#10601 - Need some way to create IDB events?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: copy events and content from server
- Re: copy events and content from server
- [IndexedDB] Bug#11401 -We should disallow .transaction() from within setVersion transactions
- [IndexedDB] Bug#10601 - Need some way to create IDB events?
- copy events and content from server
- Re: paste events and HTML support - interest in exposing a DOM tree?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: Does WebApps want to do work in Model-driven Views area?
- Does WebApps want to do work in Model-driven Views area?
- Re: paste events and HTML support - interest in exposing a DOM tree?
- Re: [widgets] Widget Updates tests?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: Model-driven Views
- Re: Model-driven Views
Monday, 2 May 2011
- Re: [Indexeddb} Bug # 9653 - nullable violations on parameters
- Re: paste events and HTML support - interest in exposing a DOM tree?
- Re: [widgets] Dig Sig spec
- Re: paste events and HTML support - interest in exposing a DOM tree?
- RE: [Indexeddb} Bug # 9653 - nullable violations on parameters
- Re: paste events and HTML support - interest in exposing a DOM tree?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- [indexeddb] result attribute for IDBRequest is set to undefined when calling IDBObjectStore.clear()
- Re: Proposal for a web application descriptor
- Re: [widgets] Dig Sig spec
- Re: [workers] Processing comments from 10-Mar-2011 LCWD
- [widgets] Processing comments from 22-Mar-2011 LCWD of Widgets P&C
- Re: paste events and HTML support - interest in exposing a DOM tree?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: Proposal for a web application descriptor
- Re: Proposal for a web application descriptor
- Re: Proposal for a web application descriptor
Friday, 29 April 2011
Monday, 2 May 2011
Sunday, 1 May 2011
Saturday, 30 April 2011
Friday, 29 April 2011
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: [Bug 11606] New: wanted: awareness of non-persistent web storage
- [Bug 12574] New: AbstractWorker and WorkerGlobalScope should inherit EventTarget
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: [widgets] Dig Sig spec
- [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)
- Re: Model-driven Views
Thursday, 28 April 2011
Friday, 29 April 2011
Thursday, 28 April 2011
- Re: Global variables and id lookup for elements
- Re: Global variables and id lookup for elements
- Global variables and id lookup for elements
- Server-Side Events encoded in JSON
- Server-Sent Event types
- Re: [webstorage] Plan to address open Bugs?
- Re: [webstorage] Plan to address open Bugs?
- [webstorage] Plan to address open Bugs?
- Re: [workers] Processing comments from 10-Mar-2011 LCWD
- [workers] Processing comments from 10-Mar-2011 LCWD
- [eventsource] Processing comments from the 10-Mar-2011 LCWD
- Re: [widgets] Widget Updates tests?
- Re: [widgets] Widget Updates tests?
- Re: Model-driven Views
- Re: [widgets] Widget Updates tests?
- Re: Model-driven Views
- Re: Model-driven Views
- Re: Model-driven Views
- Re: [widgets] Widget Updates tests?
- Re: Model-driven Views
- Re: Model-driven Views
- Re: Model-driven Views
- Re: Model-driven Views
Wednesday, 27 April 2011
- Re: Model-driven Views
- Re: Model-driven Views
- Re: Model-driven Views
- Call for Test Suite Contributions (WebApps testing process now considered operational)
- Re: Model-driven Views
- Re: [widgets] Widget Updates tests?
- Re: [widgets] Widget Updates tests?
- Re: [widgets] Widget Updates tests?
- Re: [Indexeddb} Bug # 9653 - nullable violations on parameters
- Re: [Indexeddb} Bug # 9653 - nullable violations on parameters
- Re: [Indexeddb} Bug # 9653 - nullable violations on parameters
- [Indexeddb} Bug # 9653 - nullable violations on parameters
- Re: Model-driven Views
Tuesday, 26 April 2011
- RE: [IndexedDB] Isolation mode -- edit
- Re: [IndexedDB] Discrepancies with the Event type of error in section 4.12
- Re: [widgets] Widget Updates tests?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Discrepancies with the Event type of error in section 4.12
- Re: [IndexedDB] Discrepancies with the Event type of error in section 4.12
- Re: [IndexedDB] which names can be the empty string?
- Re: [IndexedDB] which names can be the empty string?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Discrepancies with the Event type of error in section 4.12
- Re: [widgets] Widget Updates tests?
- Re: [widgets] Proposal to update Dig Sig spec; deadline May 3
- Re: [widgets] Proposal to update Dig Sig spec; deadline May 3
- Re: [IndexedDB] which names can be the empty string?
- Re: Model-driven Views
- [widgets] Proposal to update Dig Sig spec; deadline May 3
- Re: [widgets] Dig Sig spec
- Re: [widgets] Dig Sig spec
- Re: [widgets] Dig Sig spec
- Re: Model-driven Views
- Re: [widgets] Dig Sig spec
- Re: Widget URI tests
- Re: [widgets] Widget Updates tests?
- Re: [widgets] missing tests?
- Re: Model-driven Views
- Re: Model-driven Views
- RE: [indexedDB] transaction.objectStore(...) method question
- RE: [indexeddb] Cursor data Question
- Re: [indexeddb] Cursor data Question
- Re: [indexedDB] transaction.objectStore(...) method question
- Re: [IndexedDB] which names can be the empty string?
- [indexeddb] Cursor data Question
- [indexedDB] transaction.objectStore(...) method question
- RE: [IndexedDB] Discrepancies with the Event type of error in section 4.12
- [IndexedDB] which names can be the empty string?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Isolation mode -- edit
- Re: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- Re: [IndexedDB] Discrepancies with the Event type of error in section 4.12
Monday, 25 April 2011
- RE: [IndexedDB] Discrepancies with the Event type of error in section 4.12
- Re: [IndexedDB] Discrepancies with the Event type of error in section 4.12
- RE: [IndexedDB] Discrepancies with the Event type of error in section 4.12
- Re: [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
- Re: Improving DOM Traversal and DOM XPath
- Re: Improving DOM Traversal and DOM XPath
- Re: Improving DOM Traversal and DOM XPath
- Re: Model-driven Views
- Re: [IndexedDB] Discrepancies with the Event type of error in section 4.12
- Improving DOM Traversal and DOM XPath
Saturday, 23 April 2011
Monday, 25 April 2011
- Re: No longer representing Opera
- [IndexedDB] Discrepancies with the Event type of error in section 4.12
- [widgets] Dig Sig spec
- No longer representing Opera
Saturday, 23 April 2011
Friday, 22 April 2011
- [widgets] Reminder: Last Call Working Draft of Widgets P&C; deadline May 1
- [Bug 12438] Sync API for setVersion should specify a callback method and timeout value
Thursday, 21 April 2011
- RE: [IndexedDB] Sync API for setVersion Changes
- RE: [IndexedDB] Isolation mode -- edit
- Re: [IndexedDB] Isolation mode -- edit
- Re: [IndexedDB] Sync API for setVersion Changes
- Re: [IndexedDB] Spec Question on IDBFactory open method
- [IndexedDB] Isolation mode -- edit
- RE: [IndexedDB] Sync API for setVersion Changes
- Re: Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web Workers; deadline April 21
- RE: Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web Workers; deadline April 21
- RE: [IndexedDB] Spec Question on IDBFactory open method
- Re: CfC: WebApps testing process; deadline April 20
- Re: CfC: WebApps testing process; deadline April 20
- RE: Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web Workers; deadline April 21
- Re: publish new Working Draft of Indexed Database API; deadline April 16
- Re: Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web Workers; deadline April 21
- Re: Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web Workers; deadline April 21
- Re: Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web Workers; deadline April 21
- Re: Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web Workers; deadline April 21
Wednesday, 20 April 2011
- RE: CfC: WebApps testing process; deadline April 20
- Re: Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web Workers; deadline April 21
- Re: Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web Workers; deadline April 21
- Re: Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web Workers; deadline April 21
- Re: Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web Workers; deadline April 21
- Re: [IndexedDB] Spec Question on IDBFactory open method
- Re: Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web Workers; deadline April 21
- Re: [IndexedDB] Sync API for setVersion Changes
- Re: [IndexedDB] Exceptions in IDB and the DOMException
- [XHR2] Blobs, names and FormData
- Re: [IndexedDB] Spec Question on IDBFactory open method
- Re: Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web Workers; deadline April 21
- RE: [IndexedDB] Spec Question on IDBFactory open method
- Re: Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web Workers; deadline April 21
- RE: Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web Workers; deadline April 21
Monday, 18 April 2011
Wednesday, 20 April 2011
- [IndexedDB] Exceptions in IDB and the DOMException
- Re: [XHR2] Overriding the MIME type in XHR2 after the request has started
Tuesday, 19 April 2011
- RE: publish new Working Draft of Indexed Database API; deadline April 16
- Re: CfC: WebApps testing process; deadline April 20
- Re: CfC: WebApps testing process; deadline April 20
- Re: CfC: WebApps testing process; deadline April 20
- Re: [XHR2] Overriding the MIME type in XHR2 after the request has started
- [XHR2] Overriding the MIME type in XHR2 after the request has started
- Overriding the MIME type in XHR2 after the request has started
- Re: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- Re: HTML5 Filesystem API feedback
- Re: HTML5 Filesystem API feedback
Monday, 18 April 2011
- Re: CfC: WebApps testing process; deadline April 20
- Re: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- Re: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- Re: CfC: WebApps testing process; deadline April 20
- RE: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- Re: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- Re: CfC: WebApps testing process; deadline April 20
- RE: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
Saturday, 16 April 2011
Monday, 18 April 2011
Sunday, 17 April 2011
Saturday, 16 April 2011
Friday, 15 April 2011
- Re: HTML5 Filesystem API feedback
- Re: HTML5 Filesystem API feedback
- Re: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- Re: HTML5 Filesystem API feedback
- RE: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- Re: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- RE: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- Re: HTML5 Filesystem API feedback
- Re: Suggestion (redirection)
Wednesday, 13 April 2011
Friday, 15 April 2011
- Re: Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web Workers; deadline April 21
- Re: More questions about contextual reference nodes
Thursday, 14 April 2011
- Re: Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web Workers; deadline April 21
- Re: More questions about contextual reference nodes
- Re: More questions about contextual reference nodes
- Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Server-sent Events; deadline April 21
- Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web Workers; deadline April 21
- Re: [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
- Re: [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
- Re: [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
Wednesday, 13 April 2011
- Re: [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
- Re: [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
- Please use public-webapps-testsuite for testing discussions
- CfC: WebApps testing process; deadline April 20
- Re: [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
- Re: More questions about contextual reference nodes
- Re: More questions about contextual reference nodes
- Re: [FileAPI] BlobBuilder.getBlob should clear the BlobBuilder
- Re: Server Sent Events vs Web Sockets?
- Re: [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
- Re: [FileAPI] BlobBuilder.getBlob should clear the BlobBuilder
- [FileAPI] Immutability and structured clones of File
- Re: More questions about contextual reference nodes
- Re: [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
- Re: [FileAPI] BlobBuilder.getBlob should clear the BlobBuilder
- Re: More questions about contextual reference nodes
- Re: More questions about contextual reference nodes
- Re: More questions about contextual reference nodes
- Re: Support for matchesSelector()
- Re: More questions about contextual reference nodes
- Re: [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
- Re: [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
- Re: [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
- Re: [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
- Re: [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
- Re: [FileAPI] BlobBuilder.getBlob should clear the BlobBuilder
Tuesday, 12 April 2011
- [FileAPI] BlobBuilder.getBlob should clear the BlobBuilder
- Re: [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
- Re: [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
- Re: [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
- Re: [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
- Re: [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
- Re: [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
- Re: [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
- Re: [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
- Re: [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
- Re: [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
- Re: [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
- Re: [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
- Re: [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
- Re: [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
- Re: [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
- Re: [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
- Re: [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
- Re: [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
- Re: [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
- Re: [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
- Re: [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
- Re: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- Re: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- Re: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- Re: [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
- [FileAPI] File.slice spec bug
- Re: publish new Working Draft of Indexed Database API; deadline April 16
- [Bug 10623] Simplify Web IDL exceptions
- [Bug 10622] ECMAScript binding for exceptions
- Re: CfC: new WD of Clipboard API and Events; deadline April 5
- RE: publish new Working Draft of Indexed Database API; deadline April 16
Monday, 11 April 2011
- Re: [FileAPI] FileWriter and read-only files
- Re: [FileAPI] FileWriter and read-only files
- Re: [FileAPI] FileWriter and read-only files
- Re: [FileAPI] FileWriter and read-only files
- Re: [FileAPI] FileWriter and read-only files
- [FileAPI] FileWriter and read-only files
- RE: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- Re: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- Re: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- Re: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- Re: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- Re: Offline Web Applications status
- Re: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- Re: [FileAPI] Seeking status and plan
- RE: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- Re: Support for matchesSelector()
- Re: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- Re: [FileAPI] Seeking status and plan
- [FileAPI] Seeking status and plan
Sunday, 10 April 2011
- Re: CfC: new WD of Clipboard API and Events; deadline April 5
- Re: More questions about contextual reference nodes
- Re: More questions about contextual reference nodes
- Re: CfC: new WD of Clipboard API and Events; deadline April 5
- Re: CfC: new WD of Clipboard API and Events; deadline April 5
- Re: How many ways to save store app data?
- Re: Support for matchesSelector()
- Re: More questions about contextual reference nodes
Saturday, 9 April 2011
- Re: CfC: publish new Working Draft of Indexed Database API; deadline April 16
- Re: More questions about contextual reference nodes
- Re: CfC: publish new Working Draft of Indexed Database API; deadline April 16
- Re: [widgets] localizing author
- Re: CfC: publish new Working Draft of Indexed Database API; deadline April 16
- Re: More questions about contextual reference nodes
- [IndexedDB] Features not included in the first version of the spec
- CfC: publish new Working Draft of Indexed Database API; deadline April 16
- More questions about contextual reference nodes
Friday, 8 April 2011
- Re: [widgets] localizing author
- Re: Support for matchesSelector()
- Re: :scope definition ambiguity
- :scope definition ambiguity
- Re: Support for matchesSelector()
- Re: Support for matchesSelector()
- Support for matchesSelector()
- [widgets] localizing author
Thursday, 7 April 2011
- Re: Offline Web Applications status
- Re: RfC: WebApps Testing Process
- Re: Offline Web Applications status
- Re: Offline Web Applications status
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
Monday, 4 April 2011
Wednesday, 6 April 2011
- Re: ISSUE-173 (ericu): terminal FileWriter progress events should be queued [File API: Writer]
- Re: RfC: WebApps Testing Process
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: RfC: WebApps Testing Process
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- [Bug 12438] New: Sync API for setVersion should specify a callback method and timeout value
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- RE: publish new WD of WebSockets API; deadline April 13
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: RfC: WebApps Testing Process
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: RfC: WebApps Testing Process
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: RfC: WebApps Testing Process
- CfC: publish new WD of WebSockets API; deadline April 13
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- [Bug 12433] New: Define which status code and reason to use in the close frame for close(), when navigating away, and when garbage collecting an open websocket
- Re: [widgets] possible test errors for The Widget Interface?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: RfC: WebApps Testing Process
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- RE: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
Tuesday, 5 April 2011
- RE: [websockets] What needs to be done before the spec is LC ready?
- Re: [websockets] What needs to be done before the spec is LC ready?
- Re: [websockets] What needs to be done before the spec is LC ready?
- Re: [websockets] What needs to be done before the spec is LC ready?
- [websockets] What needs to be done before the spec is LC ready?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
Monday, 4 April 2011
- Re: RfC: WebApps Testing Process
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: Web SQL Database specification
- Re: How to standardize new Offline Web app features? [Was Re: Offline Web Applications status]
- Re: Web SQL Database specification
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
Thursday, 31 March 2011
Friday, 1 April 2011
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
Monday, 4 April 2011
- CfC: publish new WDs of File API: {Writer, Directories and System}; deadline April 11
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: RfC: WebApps Testing Process
- Please use public-test-infra list for testharness.js discussions [Was: RfC: WebApps Testing Process]
- Re: RfC: WebApps Testing Process
- [widgets] possible test errors for The Widget Interface?
- Re: How to standardize new Offline Web app features? [Was Re: Offline Web Applications status]
- Re: How to standardize new Offline Web app features? [Was Re: Offline Web Applications status]
Sunday, 3 April 2011
- Re: RfC: WebApps Testing Process
- Re: RfC: WebApps Testing Process
- [Bug 12411] New: eventsource: in "dispatch the event", step 3, looks like "Otherwise" is bogus and should be removed.
Saturday, 2 April 2011
- Re: Selectors API IDL Issues
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: How to standardize new Offline Web app features? [Was Re: Offline Web Applications status]
- Re: Selectors API IDL Issues
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: Selectors API IDL Issues
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: Selectors API IDL Issues
Friday, 1 April 2011
- Re: How to standardize new Offline Web app features? [Was Re: Offline Web Applications status]
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Selectors API IDL Issues
- Re: How to standardize new Offline Web app features? [Was Re: Offline Web Applications status]
- Re: How to standardize new Offline Web app features? [Was Re: Offline Web Applications status]
- [Bug 12321] Add compound keys to IndexedDB
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: RfC: WebApps Testing Process
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: Mail List Etiquette [Was: WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?]
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: Mail List Etiquette [Was: WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?]
- Re: RfC: WebApps Testing Process
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- How to standardize new Offline Web app features? [Was Re: Offline Web Applications status]
- Re: Offline Web Applications status
- Re: SearchBox API
- [Bug 12310] We should add IDBCursor.advance(number of items to move forward)