Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL? from Joran Greef on 2011-04-04 (public-webapps@w3.org from April to June 2011)

From: Joran Greef <joran@ronomon.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 17:36:20 +0200
To: Keean Schupke <keean@fry-it.com>
Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
Message-Id: <E08FCB48-29C5-42B2-AEFD-81D94F5B8A03@ronomon.com>

On 04 Apr 2011, at 5:26 PM, Keean Schupke wrote:

> This is ignoring the possibility that something like RelationalDB could be used, where a well defined common subset of SQL can be used (and I use well-defined in the formal sense). This would allow a relatively thin wrapper on top of most SQL implementations and would allow SQLite (or BDB) to be used as the backend.

Yes, if an implementation of RelationalDB arrives which is solid and fast with support for set operations that would be great. The important thing is that we have two competing APIs (and preferably a strong API with a great track record).

Received on Monday, 4 April 2011 15:36:56 UTC