- From: Keean Schupke <keean@fry-it.com>
- Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 15:30:38 +0000
- To: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
- Cc: Joran Greef <joran@ronomon.com>, public-webapps@w3.org
Received on Saturday, 2 April 2011 15:31:11 UTC
Pity. Anyway RelationalDB defines its API without reference to the underlying SQL or non-SQL database... So as a candidate for replacing WebSQL, it does not suffer from that problem. Cheers, Keean. On 2 April 2011 14:56, Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 5:24 AM, Keean Schupke <keean@fry-it.com> wrote: > >> Infact now BDB supports the SQLite-3.0 API, you can have two >> implementation that conform to the same API. So the original reason for >> abandoning WebSQL seems no longer valid. As there are now more than one >> implementation of the SQLite-3.0 API it is a de-facto (open) standard. > > > Based on > http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E17076_02/html/installation/upgrade_11gr2_51_sqlite_ver.html, > it's not like an independent implementation. > > -- > Glenn Maynard > > >
Received on Saturday, 2 April 2011 15:31:11 UTC