Re: [indexeddb] Firing order for VERSION_CHANGE event (Bug# 12179)

On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Israel Hilerio <> wrote:
> For bug# 12179 [1], what additional information we would like to capture beyond what is stipulated in the section below regarding the firing of VERSION_CHANGE events:
> 4.8 VERSION_CHANGE transaction steps. [2]
> Israel
> [1]
> [2]

IIRC the idea was to say that the event fires in the order that the
IDBDatabase objects were opened. At least within a specific page.
Cross page can be hard (or at least very slow) to enforce given that
they can be running in separate processes.

/ Jonas

Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2011 18:17:25 UTC