- From: Kenneth Russell <kbr@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 16:55:27 -0700
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: Travis Leithead <Travis.Leithead@microsoft.com>, "Jonas Sicking (jonas@sicking.cc)" <jonas@sicking.cc>, "gman@google.com" <gman@google.com>, "cmarrin@apple.com" <cmarrin@apple.com>, "glenn@zewt.org" <glenn@zewt.org>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > On Tue, 31 May 2011, Kenneth Russell wrote: >> >> Jonas's suggestion of adding another argument to postMessage, and >> Gregg's generalization to declare it as an array of objects to be >> transferred rather than copied, sounds good. > > We could change make MessagePort and ArrayBuffer both inherit from a > [NoInterfaceObject] empty interface, and then make the MessagePort[] > argument of the various postMessage() methods instead take an array of > this new interface, and then just have ArrayBuffer and MessagePort both > define how to be cloned in this way. > > If people like this approach I can work with Kenneth on getting the > wording right in the various specs. This sounds good to me; in the interest of moving things forward, are there any objections? -Ken
Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2011 23:56:10 UTC