:scope definition ambiguity

• From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
• Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2011 09:24:51 -0700
• To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
• CC: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <4D9F36D3.3040706@mit.edu>

In the text at 
http://www.w3.org/TR/selectors-api2/#the-scope-pseudo-class the term 
"belongs to a document" is not defined.  Does it mean "there is a 
Document on the parent chain", or does it mean "ownerDocument is not null"?

-Boris

Received on Friday, 8 April 2011 16:25:27 UTC