- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 22:30:00 +0000
- To: public-webapps@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12816
Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
CC| |jonas@sicking.cc
Resolution|INVALID |
--- Comment #2 from Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> 2011-05-31 22:29:59 UTC ---
It makes future expansions more consistent with current code. I.e. the API that
we'll have in the future will be a cleaner one.
The downside of course is if we don't add future arguments at all, then we've
created unnecessarily complex syntax.
But the list in [1] contains some fairly plausible properties.
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011AprJun/0732.html
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2011 22:30:03 UTC