W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2011

Battery Status API vs. Geolocation API

From: Andres Riofrio <riofrios@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 22:44:41 -0700
Message-ID: <BANLkTimO1E7yU92-MMJRZ7yvMPo-YLG_9g@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-webapps@w3.org

I have some comments on the Battery Status API.

I was wondering why it was that the battery status API is exposed
using Events (and adding an additional requirement "When an event
listener is registered with the event type batterystatus, then the
User Agent must dispatch a BatteryStatusEvent event immediately."),
when the Geolocation API is exposed using a getCurrent and a watch
function, that invoke a callback when the information is available. Is
there a rationale for using a different paradigm than the (kind of)
established Geolocation API? I think it'd be better (saner for
developers) to use the same paradigm.

Further, doesn't the requirement that a BatteryStatusEvent be
dispatched immediately incur a synchronous delay as the browser gets
that information? That is, nothing else can happen because the event
must be dispatched immediately. I might understand wrongly, but if
this is the case, I think it should be changed to "retrieves the
relevant information and dispatches a BatteryStatusEvent

Andres Riofrio
Received on Monday, 6 June 2011 10:04:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:19 UTC