- From: Eric U <ericu@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 14:42:17 -0700
- To: Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>
- Cc: Web Applications Working Group WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
It was likely just an oversight on my part that they differ. It does seem a bit odd to dispatch error/abort/loadend if aborting with no write in progress, so I favor the FileWriter/FileSaver behavior, but as long as they match, I'm not too bothered. On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com> wrote: > The abort behaviors of FileReader and File[Saver|Writer] differ. The > writing objects throw if the abort method is called when a write is not > currently under way, while the reading object does not throw. > > The behaviors should be consistent. I don't particularly care either way, > but I believe Jonas would like to change FileReader to match > File[Saver|Writer]. > > - Kyle >
Received on Tuesday, 17 May 2011 21:42:58 UTC