Re: [webstorage] Plan to address open Bugs?

On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> 
> What is the plan to address the following Web Storage bugs:
> 
> 1. Bug-12111; spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match
> implementation behavior
>   http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12111
> 
> 2. Bug-12272; Improve section on DNS spoofing attacks to address user attacks
>   http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12272
> 
> 3. Bug-12090; It would be nice to have one Storage object that you could place
> wherever you want.
>   http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12090

My plan is to address them in the order of they appear on this bug list:

   http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=exact&email1=ian%40hixie.ch&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Last+Changed&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=

In recent weeks I've been focusing on multitrack video and video 
conferencing, but I have now returned to just going through feedback. A 
precise ETA depends mostly on how many interrupts I get dealing with 
politics in the HTML WG.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Thursday, 28 April 2011 18:33:59 UTC