W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:40:50 -0700
Message-ID: <BANLkTinn3ehO=pznWFsZthPB8N2x61rgUw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>
Cc: "arun@mozilla.com" <arun@mozilla.com>, Eric Uhrhane <ericu@google.com>, "Web Applications Working Group WG (public-webapps@w3.org)" <public-webapps@w3.org>, Arun Ranganathan <aranganathan@mozilla.com>
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com> wrote:
> On Friday, April 15, 2011 12:16 PM, Arun Ranganathan wrote:
>> On 4/15/11 2:57 PM, Adrian Bateman wrote:
>> > With this in mind, I don't personally have a strong feeling either way
>> > between having to call abort() explicitly or having readAsXXX implicitly
>> > call abort(). I've discussed it with others at Microsoft this week and the
>> > consensus here is that the defensive exception is better and that developers
>> > should have to call abort() if they want to abandon the current operation.
>> > I think we could live with either but right now we're planning for throwing
>> > the exception. We'd like to make a decision one way or the other pretty
>> > soon.
>> Adrian: I'm keen to have behavior similar to XHR, and not raise an
>> exception in this case.  From your note above, I'm gathering you can
>> live with an XHR-style abort which FileReader can fire on readAsXXX
>> calls that have been superseded.
> Yes, we could live with it but the semantics are more complex. Is this the same
> as calling abort() then readAsXXX()?

Yes. I.e. the semantics of readAsX is basically:

readAsX(...) {
  if (requestInProgress)

  ... start new reading ...

> When does the abort event get queued? What
> will be the state of the reader at this point? Will loadend get fired? It needs
> careful speccing to make sure that the details are handled the same in different
> implementations.

Calling the abort() fires the "abort" and "loadend" events before the
function returns. Likewise readAsX fires the "loadstart" event before
it returns. So if a load has already started, then readAsX fires,
before it returns, the following events in order:

"abort", "loadend", "loadstart"

But indeed, the spec needs improvements here.

/ Jonas
Received on Friday, 15 April 2011 21:41:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:19 UTC