Re: Mutation events replacement

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 1:15 PM, David Flanagan <>wrote:

>> This is actually a pretty hard problem to solve, and still wouldn't really
>> solve the performance issues for DOM events....
> Still better than current DOM Mutation event, though right?  Are you saying
> that synchronous callbacks on a readonly tree would have worse performance
> than Jonas's and Olli's proposal?

I suspect, although I have not measured, than entering/leaving the JS vm
every time an attribute was modified or a node was creating would have
significantly higher overhead than batching up the calls to happen later.
 Consider generating a large amount of DOM by setting innerHTML.

- James

>  -Boris
>>     David

Received on Thursday, 30 June 2011 20:46:22 UTC