Re: Mutation events replacement

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 1:15 PM, David Flanagan <dflanagan@mozilla.com>wrote:

>
>> This is actually a pretty hard problem to solve, and still wouldn't really
>> solve the performance issues for DOM events....
>>
> Still better than current DOM Mutation event, though right?  Are you saying
> that synchronous callbacks on a readonly tree would have worse performance
> than Jonas's and Olli's proposal?
>

I suspect, although I have not measured, than entering/leaving the JS vm
every time an attribute was modified or a node was creating would have
significantly higher overhead than batching up the calls to happen later.
 Consider generating a large amount of DOM by setting innerHTML.

- James


>  -Boris
>>
>>     David
>
>