- From: Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:13:56 +0200
- To: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@gmail.com>, Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>
- Cc: Hari Kumar G <harig@opera.com>
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com> wrote: > Quote from WARP: > > """ > Let sub domains be the result of applying the rule for getting a > single attribute value to the value of the subdomains attribute. If > the value of sub domains is not a valid boolean value, then this > element is in error and the user agent MUST ignore this element. > """ > > subdomains has a default value of false so why is ignoring the > complete <access> element needed? If only the subdomains is to be > ignored, then the steps for processing the config.xml need to be > changed to include the default value. > I've removed the following two tests from the test suite until we get this resolved: # ic (download, files) Tests that the UA ignores an access element with an invalid subdomains value. To pass, the remote script must NOT load and PASS must remain displayed. # id (download, files) Tests that the UA ignores an access element with an invalid subdomains value. To pass, the remote script must NOT load and PASS must remain displayed. -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Thursday, 2 June 2011 15:14:44 UTC