- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:21:05 -0400
- To: public-webapps@w3.org, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
My take on the comments is that most commentors prefer the spec to be changed as PLH suggested in comment #5: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12111#c5 Hixie - are you willing to change the spec accordingly? -AB On Jun/8/2011 7:57 AM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote: > There are now 11 comments on Web Storage Bug 12111, the last remaining > bug before moving this spec back to Last Call: > > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12111 > > If anyone has additional comments, please add them to the bug before > the end of this week. > > I would like to get consensus on this bug soon and would prefer we do > so via e-mail and not have to start some type of poll/survey. > > -Thanks, AB > > On Feb/17/2011 10:17 AM, ext bugzilla@jessica.w3.org wrote: >> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12111 >> >> Summary: spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does >> not >> match implementation behavior >> Product: WebAppsWG >> Version: unspecified >> Platform: PC >> OS/Version: All >> Status: NEW >> Severity: normal >> Priority: P2 >> Component: Web Storage (editor: Ian Hickson) >> AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch >> ReportedBy: mike@w3.org >> QAContact: member-webapi-cvs@w3.org >> CC: ian@hixie.ch, mike@w3.org, public-webapps@w3.org >> >> >> http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/#dom-storage-getitem says that "The >> getItem(key) method must return a structured clone of the current value >> associated with the given key." but all browsers I've tested return a >> string >> representation of the value instead. >> >
Received on Friday, 10 June 2011 16:21:44 UTC