W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2011

RE: [IndexedDB] Evictable stores

From: Pablo Castro <Pablo.Castro@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:01:27 +0000
To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
CC: "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <F108E2F6BA743C4696146F0B7111C26127CBD0@TK5EX14MBXC244.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

From: Jonas Sicking [mailto:jonas@sicking.cc] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 5:34 PM

>> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Pablo Castro
>> <Pablo.Castro@microsoft.com> wrote:
>> > We discussed evictable stores some time ago and captured it in bug 11350 [1], but I haven't seen further discussion on it and it hasn't gone into the spec. I'm curious on where folks are with this? Should we move it to v2? Should we just allow UAs to have their own policy around eviction (back at TPAC it seemed folks had reasonable but different strategies for handling when to allow websites to use storage already).
>> I think this is a very interesting feature, but one that I'd prefer to
>> move to a version 2 as it isn't a required feature and is one that
>> seems easy to "retrofit".
>> / Jonas

The feature is already captured in the wiki page that tracks future features [1]. So I guess we can just resolve the bug as "later". 

Jeremy, the bug is currently assigned to you, were you doing work on it or should I just resolve it?


[1] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/IndexedDatabaseFeatures
Received on Tuesday, 7 June 2011 18:01:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:20 UTC