- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 23:26:16 +0000
- To: public-webapps@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12917
Adrian Bateman [MSFT] <adrianba@microsoft.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID |
--- Comment #4 from Adrian Bateman [MSFT] <adrianba@microsoft.com> 2011-06-21 23:26:15 UTC ---
The point of extensions is that they are not a mandatory part of the spec. They
are not required for interop. It is perfectly possible to make a client and
service work without deflate-stream. Just as the extension is optional for a
service, it should be optional for a client. I don't understand why this is an
interoperability nightmare - it's part of the extensibility mechanism in the
protocol.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2011 23:26:17 UTC