- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:34:37 -0700
- To: Mark Pilgrim <pilgrim@google.com>
- Cc: "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
I say we should allow the empty string. Apparently there were no specific reason why we added such a check to our code. / Jonas On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Mark Pilgrim <pilgrim@google.com> wrote: > I have no opinion whatsoever, except that the spec should specify it > one way or the other so I can close these bugs. :) > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: >> Good question. I don't have a strong opinion. It makes sense to me to >> allow anything. Don't know I there was any reason we added explicit >> checks. >> >> / Jonas >> >> On Monday, April 25, 2011, Mark Pilgrim <pilgrim@google.com> wrote: >>> 1. Can an object store be named the empty string? >>> >>> 2. Can an index be named the empty string? >>> >>> Other things, like databases, are allowed to have a name that is the >>> empty string. Mozilla has tests that expect both of the above cases to >>> fail, but as I'm porting those tests to WebKit, it's not clear from my >>> reading of the spec whether those tests are valid. >>> >>> -Mark Pilgrim >>> >>> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 26 April 2011 17:35:35 UTC