That text requires the storage mutex, which has not and will not be implemented by any vendors, let alone 2 interoperable implementations, so it seems rather doomed. - James On Jun 16, 2011 8:58 AM, "Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org> wrote: > Art wrote: >> All - given that addressing 12111 is a low priority for Ian, one way >> forward is for someone else to create a concrete proposal. > > Here is a concrete proposal: > http://www.w3.org/2011/06/Web%20Storage.html > > Philippe > > >Received on Thursday, 16 June 2011 19:00:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:20 UTC