- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 08:13:08 +0000
- To: public-webapps@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10337
Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #1 from Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> 2011-06-20 08:13:08 UTC ---
The first case doesn't need [Supplemental] any more.
For the second case, I'd like a more descriptive name than [Supplemental].
I've used [CopyInheritedPrototype], but let me know if you think of something
better.
For the third case, I think using extended attributes for this isn't right; we
need something in the core IDL syntax. I've added this syntax:
interface HTMLAnchorElement : HTMLElement {
// ...
};
partial interface HTMLAnchorElement {
// the attributes not fit for polite company
};
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Monday, 20 June 2011 08:13:14 UTC