RE: [Indexeddb} Bug # 9653 - nullable violations on parameters

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> Excellent! I think that should mean that no changes are needed to the
> IndexedDB spec at all. I can't think of any instances where we use specific
> interface names while still accepting null values.
> / Jonas

This implies the bug can be resolved, correct?


Received on Monday, 2 May 2011 20:50:08 UTC