RE: [Indexeddb} Bug # 9653 - nullable violations on parameters from Israel Hilerio on 2011-05-02 (public-webapps@w3.org from April to June 2011)

From: Israel Hilerio <israelh@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 20:49:37 +0000
To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <F695AF7AA77CC745A271AD0F61BBC61E3D03F0F2@TK5EX14MBXC113.redmond.corp.microsoft.>

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> Excellent! I think that should mean that no changes are needed to the
> IndexedDB spec at all. I can't think of any instances where we use specific
> interface names while still accepting null values.
> 
> / Jonas

This implies the bug can be resolved, correct?

Israel

Received on Monday, 2 May 2011 20:50:08 UTC