Le 17 mai 2011 à 19:06, Daniel Cheng a écrit : > I would like to add all of the 3 MathML flavors: > > - application/mathml-presentation+xml > - application/mathml-content+xml > - application/mathml+xml > > paul > > I don't think we need all 3. Why not just application/mathml+xml? Daniel, you do mean all three MathML flavors, right? The reason they are each useful is that: some applications can do MathML-presentation and not content (example: MS Word) some applications can do MathML-content and would loose information by receiving presentation (example: Maple, with a limit expression, I think a spreadsheet could also) some applications just do not know or care, for them the generic flavor is ok some applications will do a conversion content-to-presentation in a way better than others, in particular if the language context is properly considered (e.g. considering the varying numbers' syntax) paul
Received on Tuesday, 17 May 2011 17:15:50 UTC