- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:25:34 -0700
- To: Israel Hilerio <israelh@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Israel Hilerio <israelh@microsoft.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: >> >> Looks great to me. Remember that we need to make both .transaction and >> .setVersion throw if called within the callback from either of them. >> >> / Jonas >> >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Israel Hilerio <israelh@microsoft.com> >> wrote: >> > I've created a bug to outline a potential change to the Sync API to handle >> the context for setVersion transaction inside a callback method. I wanted to >> follow up with the group to see what other people's thought about this >> change. The Bug has all the details for the proposed change. The bug# is >> 12438 [1]. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > Israel >> > >> > [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12438 >> > >> > >> > > Good catch. What about adding the following to those two methods: > > New setVersion Exception: > * The setVersion method needs to throw IDBDatabaseException with a NOT_ALLOWED_ERR description when the setVersion method is called from within the IDBTransactionCallback of a transaction method. > > New transaction Exception: > * The transaction method needs throw IDBDatabaseException with a NOT_ALLOWED_ERR description when the transaction method is called from within the IDBTransactionCallback of a setVersion method. Both should say "within the IDBTransactionCallback of a transaction or setVersion method", right? Or simply "within the IDBTransactionCallback". / Jonas
Received on Thursday, 21 April 2011 23:26:31 UTC