Re: [Indexeddb} Bug # 9653 - nullable violations on parameters

On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Israel Hilerio <> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> Excellent! I think that should mean that no changes are needed to the
>> IndexedDB spec at all. I can't think of any instances where we use specific
>> interface names while still accepting null values.
>> / Jonas
> This implies the bug can be resolved, correct?

Unless someone points out any specific functions in the API that needs
clarification, I think we should close the bug yes.

/ Jonas

Received on Monday, 2 May 2011 23:28:48 UTC