- From: Travis Leithead <Travis.Leithead@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:15:40 +0000
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- CC: Andrew Wilson <atwilson@google.com>, Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>, "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>, Dmitry Lomov <dslomov@google.com>, David Levin <levin@chromium.org>, ben turner <bent.mozilla@gmail.com>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, ext Kenneth Russell <kbr@google.com>
Bug: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12947 -----Original Message----- From: Travis Leithead Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 10:49 AM To: Arthur Barstow Cc: Andrew Wilson; Glenn Maynard; Jonas Sicking; Dmitry Lomov; David Levin; ben turner; public-webapps@w3.org; Ian Hickson; ext Kenneth Russell Subject: FW: What changes to Web Messaging spec are proposed? [Was: Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers] >From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com] On Jun/8/2011 5:24 >PM, ext Kenneth Russell wrote: >> My understanding is that we have reached a proposal which respecifies >> the "ports" argument to postMessage as an array of objects to >> transfer, in such a way that we: >> >> - Maintain 100% backward compatibility >> - Enhance the ability to pass MessagePorts, so that the object >> graph can refer to them as well >> - Allow more object types to participate in transfer of ownership >> in the future >> >> To the best of my knowledge there are no active points of >> disagreement. I think we are only waiting for general consensus from >> all interested parties that this is the desired step to take. >> >> If it is, I would be happy to draft proposed edits to the associated >> specs; there are several, and the edits may be somewhat involved. I'd >> also be happy to share the work with Ian or anyone else. > >Concrete proposals should be helpful and it may make sense to first use >Bugzilla to capture the related issues for the various specs. I'll get a bug filed with the summarized proposal as discussed in this thread. Thanks!
Received on Monday, 13 June 2011 18:16:18 UTC