- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 18:11:38 +0200
- To: "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>, Alfonso MartÃnez de Lizarrondo <amla70@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Webapps WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:43:13 +0200, Alfonso MartÃnez de Lizarrondo <amla70@gmail.com> wrote: > Providing an automatic filename it's better than sending an empty one, > but it fails to address interaction with existing systems (some might > refuse the upload if it doesn't look like a correct file type, at the > very least a > proper extension). The usual "solution" suggested/used when people create > samples or code using these features is to add extra headers to send the > desired filename, but that means that the server code has to be updated > to handle this behavior. What is the extension for unknown arbitrary contents? Is it .bin? We could also name it "blob.blob" if that improves matters. It really does not matter much. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 29 June 2011 16:12:00 UTC