W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2011

RE: [indexeddb] IDBTransaction.oncomplete event type equals commit

From: Israel Hilerio <israelh@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:49:55 +0000
To: ben turner <bent.mozilla@gmail.com>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <F695AF7AA77CC745A271AD0F61BBC61E3D17A84F@TK5EX14MBXC119.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
>On Thursday, June 23, 2011 1:52 PM, Israel Hilerio wrote:
>>We noticed that section "4.3 Steps for committing a transaction" talks about setting the event type for the IDBTransction.oncomplete event handler to "commit".   
>>Did we intend for the handler to be named "oncommit" or should the event type be "complete".  
>>The current wording implies that the reason the transaction completed was because it was committed.  
>>The different terms made the section a little inconsistent.
>>Do we want to change any names or keep it as is?

On Thursday, June 23, 2011 2:04 PM, Ben Turner wrote:
>I think "complete" should be the correct type string.
> -Ben Turner

If everyone else agrees with Ben and me, I can work with Eliot to make the change to the spec.

Received on Monday, 27 June 2011 17:50:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:20 UTC