Re: [IndexedDB] Closing on bug 9903 (collations)

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Keean Schupke <keean@fry-it.com> wrote:
> Why does it need to be persisted? I would prefer the database to be
> stateless. Obviously all users of the database need to use the same
> function.

And if they don't use exactly the same function, maybe due to a
transient bug, the index is silently and permanently corrupted, until
all affected rows happen to be updated again?  That doesn't sound like
a good idea to me.

Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2011 23:00:34 UTC