On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Keean Schupke <keean@fry-it.com> wrote: > Why does it need to be persisted? I would prefer the database to be > stateless. Obviously all users of the database need to use the same > function. And if they don't use exactly the same function, maybe due to a transient bug, the index is silently and permanently corrupted, until all affected rows happen to be updated again? That doesn't sound like a good idea to me.Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2011 23:00:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:19 UTC