RE: [IndexedDB] Isolation mode -- edit from Eliot Graff on 2011-04-21 (public-webapps@w3.org from April to June 2011)

From: Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 23:37:04 +0000
To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
CC: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CE3A5BFD1228D84A8D9C158EEC195FD53CC2A0BC@TK5EX14MBXW601.wingroup.windeploy.ntde>

> What we're trying to convey is that two requests placed against different can
> execute in any order, but that this doesn't matter, and the isolation mode
> and the transaction scheduling ensures that.
> 

Thanks, that makes sense. Any objection to using your phraseology? 

There is no guarantee about the order in which results from requests in different transactions are returned. Similarly, the transaction modes ensure that two requests placed against different transactions can execute in any order without consequence.

Thanks,

Eliot

Received on Thursday, 21 April 2011 23:37:33 UTC