[widgets] Dig Sig spec

I've been reviewing and trying to implement the widgets dig sig spec and I'm finding that there is a lot of redundancies and inconsistencies with the way it is written. Although the conformance requirements are fairly clear, the main problem is that the spec is a bit confused when it comes to algorithms and processing. It also states things that really should just be deferred to XML Dig Sig 1.1. If it's ok with everyone, I want to have a go at rewriting it with the goal of making it simpler to implement. 

-- 
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au

Received on Monday, 25 April 2011 15:53:32 UTC