- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 20:42:03 -0400
- To: ext Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- CC: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Apr/14/2011 6:39 PM, ext Jonas Sicking wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Arthur Barstow<art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote: >> This is a Request for Comments for the March 10 Last Call Working Draft of >> Web Workers: >> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-workers-20110310/ >> >> If you have any comments, please send them to the following list by 21 April >> 2011 at the latest: > There are currently two bugs filed against the spec. Do these bugs > count as last call comments? > > http://bit.ly/fl2uSB > Yes, I think both of these bugs should be considered LC comments. (Bug 12067 was submitted between the Feb 12 "is Workers ready for LC?" query [1] and the Feb 28 CfC to publish the LC [2]. As such, it probably should have been considered before publishing the LC.) On March 9, Adrian submitted comments after the CfC closed and those comments should also be considered LC comments: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JanMar/0877.html -AB [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JanMar/0536.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JanMar/0696.html
Received on Friday, 15 April 2011 00:42:35 UTC