public-prov-wg@w3.org from February 2012 by author

Cresswell, Stephen

• RE: PROV-ISSUE-268 (two-level-ontology): Two Level Ontology? [Ontology] (Friday, 24 February)
• Comments on PROV-O (Thursday, 23 February)

Curt Tilmes

• Re: VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT) (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: use case agent (Saturday, 18 February)
• Re: Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55) (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: PROV-DM Simplification (Wednesday, 15 February)

Daniel Garijo

• Re: VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: [provo] Characteristics of the object properties in the OWL ontology (Sunday, 26 February)
• New prov-o ontology! (Friday, 24 February)
• Feedback about DM draft 4 (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-262 (qualifier-property): entity used entity? [Ontology] (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping (Sunday, 12 February)
• Re: prov-o team to list left hand sides of DM mapping rules (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: prov-o team to list left hand sides of DM mapping rules (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: Scruffy vs proper (was: PROV-ISSUE-249 (two-derivations): Why do we have 3 derivations? [prov-dm]) (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-249 (two-derivations): Why do we have 3 derivations? [prov-dm] (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-242 (TLebo): generated twice? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-242 (TLebo): generated twice? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-240 (TLebo): highlight optionals in wasGeneratedBy([id],e,a,[t],[attrs]) [prov-dm] (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: why provenance matters :-) (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-231 (TLebo): Remove owl:Time from prov-o [Ontology] (Thursday, 2 February)

Deus, Helena

• survey on (linked) data quality on the web (Monday, 20 February)
• The Quality of Linked Data (with an emphasis on drug discovery) (Thursday, 16 February)

Eric

• RE: VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT) (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Connection Task Force Meeting Monday Feb 13 (Monday, 13 February)

Eric Stephan

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-272 (TLebo): PROV examples collection (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Collecting PROV examples (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Collecting PROV examples (Tuesday, 28 February)
• PROV-DM Simplication Reviewer Feedback... (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: use case agent (Saturday, 18 February)
• PROV-O Review Comments to Sections 1 - 3.1.6 (Friday, 10 February)
• Connection Task Force Meeting Monday Feb 13 (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: Update Connection TF (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: Update Connection TF (Monday, 6 February)

Graham Klyne

• Re: Collections in PROV-O (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Provenance model, syntax and formal properties (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-265 (TLebo): RL, why? [Ontology] (Friday, 24 February)
• Provenance model, syntax and formal properties (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Review of PROV-DM (WD4) up to section 5 (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Review of PROV-DM (WD4) up to section 5 (Thursday, 23 February)
• Review of PROV-DM (WD4) up to section 5 (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-256 (TLebo): change namespace of prov-o (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55) (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: Prov-wg: Telecon agenda Feb 16, 2012 (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Scruffy vs proper (Friday, 10 February)
• Scruffy vs proper (was: PROV-ISSUE-249 (two-derivations): Why do we have 3 derivations? [prov-dm]) (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Wednesday, 8 February)
• F2F chat log online? (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-242 (TLebo): generated twice? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Monday, 6 February)
• Fwd: URI Template spec has been approved (Saturday, 4 February)

Ivan Herman

• Re: Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55) (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55) (Thursday, 16 February)
• Alex Hall's review of the XSD 1.1 changes and their relevance to the RDF WG (Friday, 3 February)
• Fwd: JWS special issue: reasoning with context in the Semantic Web, v12 (2012) (Friday, 3 February)

James Cheney

• Re: URGENT feedback needed Re: ProvRDF: new mapping markup (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (Friday, 24 February)
• Action-61: PROV-SEM synchronized to WD3; please review (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: reviewer feedback on prov-o ontology (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: ACTION-56: ProvRDF mappings ready for review (Thursday, 16 February)
• ACTION-56: ProvRDF mappings ready for review (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: prov-xml: initiating discussion (Sunday, 5 February)
• PROV-SEM slides (Friday, 3 February)

Jim McCusker

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-273 (name-for-asn): what name for the provenance notation [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Provenance model, syntax and formal properties (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-265 (TLebo): RL, why? [Ontology] (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Comments on PROV-O (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: reviewer feedback on prov-o ontology (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: reviewer feedback on prov-o ontology (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: reviewer feedback on prov-o ontology (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Monday, 13 February)

Jun Zhao

• Re: VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT) (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Collections in PROV-O (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Collections in PROV-O (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Collections in PROV-O (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Collections in PROV-O (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Comments on PROV-O (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Collections in PROV-O (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Comments to the working draft 4 of DM (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Comments to the working draft 4 of DM (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Comments to the working draft 4 of DM (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Comments to the working draft 4 of DM (Sunday, 19 February)
• Re: use case agent (Saturday, 18 February)
• Re: PROV-O ontology comments (Thursday, 16 February)

Kai Eckert

• Re: Update Connection TF (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: Update Connection TF (Monday, 6 February)
• Update Connection TF (Monday, 6 February)

Khalid Belhajjame

• Re: ProvRDF: new mapping markup (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT) (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-268 (two-level-ontology): Two Level Ontology? [Ontology] (Monday, 27 February)
• [provo] Characteristics of the object properties in the OWL ontology (Sunday, 26 February)
• [provo] Re: PROV-ISSUE-269: involved property need to be renamed and its sup-properties need to be structured in a better manner (Sunday, 26 February)
• Comment on the DM (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: [prov-o] How to express Involvement as as an "Abstract" class in OWL (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: [prov-o] How to express Involvement as as an "Abstract" class in OWL (Thursday, 23 February)
• [prov-o] How to express Involvement as as an "Abstract" class in OWL (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Collections in PROV-O (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Collections in PROV-O (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-249 (two-derivations): Why do we have 3 derivations? [prov-dm] (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-247: Regarding Collections in prov-dm [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-245 (TLebo): entity was used -> __started__ to be used (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-237 (TLebo): Rename Relation to Involvement [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-236 (TLebo): rendered provenance is a thing in the world [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Next version of prov-o ontology for internal review (Friday, 3 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-231 (TLebo): Remove owl:Time from prov-o [Ontology] (Thursday, 2 February)

Luc Moreau

• Re: PROV-DM Simplification (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: PROV-DM Simplication Reviewer Feedback... (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Comments to the working draft 4 of DM (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: {Disarmed} Feedback about DM draft 4 (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Review of PROV-DM (WD4) up to section 5 (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Comment on the DM (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Review of DM WD4 (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Provenance model, syntax and formal properties (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Collecting PROV examples (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Collecting PROV examples (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-268 (two-level-ontology): Two Level Ontology? [Ontology] (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-268 (two-level-ontology): Two Level Ontology? [Ontology] (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-268 (two-level-ontology): Two Level Ontology? [Ontology] (Monday, 27 February)
• prov-wg meeting minutes 2012-02-23 (Saturday, 25 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (Saturday, 25 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (Saturday, 25 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-258 (TLebo): consolidate Association / Responsibility / Affiliation [prov-dm] (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Collections in PROV-O (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-268 (two-level-ontology): Two Level Ontology? [Ontology] (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: prov-o agenda (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-260 (TLebo): In Note section: cite prov:Provenance as better practice to annotate assertions. [prov-dm] (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-265 (TLebo): RL, why? [Ontology] (Friday, 24 February)
• prov-o agenda (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-256 (TLebo): change namespace of prov-o (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Provenance model, syntax and formal properties (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-261 (TLebo): alternateOf is not owl:sameAs (rephrase definition) [prov-dm] (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-216 (TLebo): qualified wasAttributedTo? [prov-dm] (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-246 (TLebo): add plan example: web page tutorial [prov-dm] (Thursday, 23 February)
• VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT) (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Review of PROV-DM (WD4) up to section 5 (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: reviewer feedback on prov-o ontology (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Comments on PROV-O (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: reviewer feedback on prov-o ontology (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: reviewer feedback on prov-o ontology (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: [prov-o] How to express Involvement as as an "Abstract" class in OWL (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Review of PROV-DM (WD4) up to section 5 (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: [prov-o] How to express Involvement as as an "Abstract" class in OWL (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: [prov-o] How to express Involvement as as an "Abstract" class in OWL (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 23 Feb 2012 (Thursday, 23 February)
• reviewer feedback on prov-o ontology (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-257 (TLebo): rename "Account"/"Bundle"/"AccountEntity" to "Provenance" [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 22 February)
• PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 23 Feb 2012 (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-260 (TLebo): In Note section: cite prov:Provenance as better practice to annotate assertions. [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-259: hadTemporalExtent domain and range [Ontology] (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Comments to the working draft 4 of DM (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Comments to the working draft 4 of DM (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Comments to the working draft 4 of DM (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: Comments to the working draft 4 of DM (Sunday, 19 February)
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? (Saturday, 18 February)
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? (Saturday, 18 February)
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55) (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: PROV-O ontology comments (Friday, 17 February)
• rdf mapping of example in prov-dm example (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: ACTION-55 is reopened (Friday, 17 February)
• ACTION-55 is reopened (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55) (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55) (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55) (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Primer actions (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55) (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: PROV-DM Simplification (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: PROV-DM Simplification (Wednesday, 15 February)
• ISSUE-135 ... ISSUE-139 (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-187: Section 5.2.2 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-200: Section 6.3 (PROV-DM as on Dec 5) [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-193: Section 5.3.2.2 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-192: Section 5.3.2.1 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: closing issues (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping (Monday, 13 February)
• closing issues (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-187: Section 5.2.2 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-189: Section 5.2.4 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-185: Section 3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-187: Section 5.2.2 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-186: Section 5.2.1 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Sunday, 12 February)
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping (Sunday, 12 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Sunday, 12 February)
• scribe required (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Wednesday, 8 February)
• PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 9 Feb 2012 (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-237 (TLebo): Rename Relation to Involvement [prov-dm] (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: prov-xml: initiating discussion (Sunday, 5 February)
• prov-xml: initiating discussion (Sunday, 5 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-231 (TLebo): Remove owl:Time from prov-o [Ontology] (Thursday, 2 February)
• f2f agenda and introduction (Wednesday, 1 February)

Miles, Simon

• RE: VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT) (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Primer update (Thursday, 23 February)
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-249 (two-derivations): Why do we have 3 derivations? [prov-dm] (Monday, 13 February)
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Sunday, 12 February)

Olaf Hartig

• Slides on PROV-AQ (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Sunday, 12 February)

Paolo Missier

• Re: Collections in PROV-O (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Collections in PROV-O (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Collections in PROV-O (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Comments to the working draft 4 of DM (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Collections in PROV-O (Thursday, 23 February)
• prov-o review / comments (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-247: Regarding Collections in prov-dm [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-242 (TLebo): generated twice? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-242 (TLebo): generated twice? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-243 (TLebo): how to interpret ASN assertions with incomplete arity? (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-242 (TLebo): generated twice? [prov-dm] (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-241 (TLebo): remove ex:order=2 in generation example (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-240 (TLebo): highlight optionals in wasGeneratedBy([id],e,a,[t],[attrs]) [prov-dm] (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-237 (TLebo): Rename Relation to Involvement [prov-dm] (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-234 (TLebo): id identifies entity, not the record [prov-dm] (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: why provenance matters :-) (Monday, 6 February)
• why provenance matters :-) (Wednesday, 1 February)

Paul Groth

• prov-wg: agenda Mar. 1, 2012 (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Collecting PROV examples (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Collecting PROV examples (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Collecting PROV examples (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Collecting PROV examples (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: prov-o agenda (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: resurrecting prov-o components design (Friday, 24 February)
• prov-wg: F2F2 Meeting Minutes (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: nice reference for qualified (Thursday, 23 February)
• nice reference for qualified (Thursday, 23 February)
• Prov-wg - Minutes of 16 Feb 2012 Telecon (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Comments to the working draft 4 of DM (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement (Tuesday, 21 February)
• prov-wg: Report on HCLS call (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Comments to the working draft 4 of DM (Sunday, 19 February)
• Re: use case agent (Saturday, 18 February)
• Re: use case agent (Saturday, 18 February)
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: use case agent (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: Updated PROV-O OWL and ProvRDF wiki page (Friday, 17 February)
• use case agent (Friday, 17 February)
• 2nd CFP: 4th Intl. Provenance and Annotation Workshop (IPAW'2012) (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55) (Thursday, 16 February)
• quick updates of the ontology (Thursday, 16 February)
• prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: PROV-O is currently within OWL-DL can we make OWL-RL? (Thursday, 16 February)
• PROV-O is currently within OWL-DL can we make OWL-RL? (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Prov-wg: Telecon agenda Feb 16, 2012 (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: closing issues (Monday, 13 February)
• bootstrapping testcases for prov (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: PROV-O call on Feb 13 (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping (Sunday, 12 February)
• quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping (Sunday, 12 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Sunday, 12 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-187: Section 5.2.2 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Sunday, 12 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Sunday, 12 February)
• blog post on third working draft of the prov-dm (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Prov presentation for HCLS Sci Discourse Task Force (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: PROV ISSUE-206 some possible proposals (Tuesday, 7 February)
• prov-wg: blog post on f2f (Sunday, 5 February)
• F2F2 Meeting Summary (Sunday, 5 February)
• update on Action 55 (updating prov-o ontology) (Friday, 3 February)
• PROV ISSUE-206 some possible proposals (Friday, 3 February)

Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker

• PROV-ISSUE-275 (TLebo): Not all prov:Bundles are sd:NamedGraphs [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (Wednesday, 29 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-274 (wd4-feedback): feedback on WD4 [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 29 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-273 (name-for-asn): what name for the provenance notation [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 28 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-272 (TLebo): PROV examples collection (Tuesday, 28 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-271 (TLebo): PROV examples collection (Tuesday, 28 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-270 (TLebo): automate HTML for OWL constructs [Ontology] (Monday, 27 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-269: involved property need to be renamed and its sup-properties need to be structured in a better manner (Sunday, 26 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-268 (two-level-ontology): Two Level Ontology? [Ontology] (Friday, 24 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-267 (TLebo): annotate all subproperty axioms to justify them [Ontology] (Friday, 24 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-266 (TLebo): RL, why? [Ontology] (Friday, 24 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-265 (TLebo): RL, why? [Ontology] (Friday, 24 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-264 (TLebo): citing an Involvement and not a more specific Involvement. [Ontology] (Friday, 24 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-263 (implicit-subject-problem): Implicit subject in Involvement causes mis-alignment [Ontology] (Thursday, 23 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-262 (qualifier-property): entity used entity? [Ontology] (Wednesday, 22 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-261 (TLebo): alternateOf is not owl:sameAs (rephrase definition) [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 22 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-260 (TLebo): In Note section: cite prov:Provenance as better practice to annotate assertions. [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 22 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-259: hadTemporalExtent domain and range [Ontology] (Wednesday, 22 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-258 (TLebo): consolidate Association / Responsibility / Affiliation [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 22 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-257 (TLebo): rename "Account"/"Bundle"/"AccountEntity" to "Provenance" [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 22 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-256 (TLebo): change namespace of prov-o (Monday, 20 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-255 (TLebo): rename ALL hadQualifiedXXX to simply prov:qualified (Monday, 20 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-254 (TLebo): rename QualifiedInvolement to Involvement [Ontology] (Monday, 20 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (Thursday, 16 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-252 (TLebo): Examples for prescribed prov attributes location and time [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 14 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-251 (TLebo): put "location" attribute into prov: prefix [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 14 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-250 (TLebo): respond to Eric's comments [Ontology] (Friday, 10 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-249 (two-derivations): Why do we have 3 derivations? [prov-dm] (Thursday, 9 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-248 (string-as-entity): How to model strings? [Formal Semantics] (Thursday, 9 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-247: Regarding Collections in prov-dm [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 8 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-246 (TLebo): add plan example: web page tutorial [prov-dm] (Monday, 6 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-245 (TLebo): entity was used -> __started__ to be used (Monday, 6 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-244 (TLebo): wasGeneratedBy(x,a,attrs,t) transposed arguments (Monday, 6 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-243 (TLebo): how to interpret ASN assertions with incomplete arity? (Monday, 6 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-242 (TLebo): generated twice? [prov-dm] (Monday, 6 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-241 (TLebo): remove ex:order=2 in generation example (Monday, 6 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-240 (TLebo): highlight optionals in wasGeneratedBy([id],e,a,[t],[attrs]) [prov-dm] (Monday, 6 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] (Monday, 6 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-238 (TLebo): order relation sections to suit a natural traversal of the Relation table [prov-dm] (Monday, 6 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-237 (TLebo): Rename Relation to Involvement [prov-dm] (Monday, 6 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-236 (TLebo): rendered provenance is a thing in the world [prov-dm] (Monday, 6 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-235 (TLebo): add MAY to namespace defining "schema" [prov-dm] (Monday, 6 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-234 (TLebo): id identifies entity, not the record [prov-dm] (Monday, 6 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Sunday, 5 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-232 (TLebo): activity start/end: direct time upgrades to instantaneous events [Ontology] (Friday, 3 February)
• PROV-ISSUE-231 (TLebo): Remove owl:Time from prov-o [Ontology] (Thursday, 2 February)

Reza B'far

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Monday, 13 February)

Reza B'Far (Oracle)

• Re: Collecting PROV examples (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Collecting PROV examples (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT) (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: use case agent (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-237 (TLebo): Rename Relation to Involvement [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-237 (TLebo): Rename Relation to Involvement [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-237 (TLebo): Rename Relation to Involvement [prov-dm] (Monday, 6 February)

runnegar@isoc.org

• Re: Update Connection TF (Monday, 6 February)

Satya Sahoo

• Re: VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT) (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-273 (name-for-asn): what name for the provenance notation [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Thursday, 23 February)
• PROV-O call (Feb 20) (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (Sunday, 19 February)
• Re: Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55) (Sunday, 19 February)
• Re: Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55) (Sunday, 19 February)
• Re: Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55) (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: PROV-O ontology comments (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: PROV-O ontology comments (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55) (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55) (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-105: 5.3.1 Generation (current version of the conceptual model document) [Conceptual Model] (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-187: Section 5.2.2 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-200: Section 6.3 (PROV-DM as on Dec 5) [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-193: Section 5.3.2.2 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-192: Section 5.3.2.1 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55) (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: PROV-O call on Feb 13 (Monday, 13 February)
• PROV-O call on Feb 13 (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Sunday, 12 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Sunday, 12 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Sunday, 12 February)
• Re: prov-o team to list left hand sides of DM mapping rules (Sunday, 12 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-189: Section 5.2.4 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Sunday, 12 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-187: Section 5.2.2 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Saturday, 11 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Saturday, 11 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-187: Section 5.2.2 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Saturday, 11 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-186: Section 5.2.1 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Saturday, 11 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-185: Section 3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Saturday, 11 February)
• Re: PROV-O call (Feb 6) (Monday, 6 February)
• PROV-O call (Feb 6) (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: update on Action 55 (updating prov-o ontology) (Friday, 3 February)

Simon Miles

• Primer actions (Thursday, 16 February)
• PROV-O ontology comments (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-207 (start and end records): start and end records [prov-dm] (Friday, 3 February)

Stephan Zednik

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-259: hadTemporalExtent domain and range [Ontology] (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-262 (qualifier-property): entity used entity? [Ontology] (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-262 (qualifier-property): entity used entity? [Ontology] (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Monday, 20 February)
• Re: use case agent (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: use case agent (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: use case agent (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: bootstrapping testcases for prov (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Monday, 13 February)

Stian Soiland-Reyes

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-270 (TLebo): automate HTML for OWL constructs [Ontology] (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-268 (two-level-ontology): Two Level Ontology? [Ontology] (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-265 (TLebo): RL, why? [Ontology] (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-268 (two-level-ontology): Two Level Ontology? [Ontology] (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: Collections in PROV-O (Saturday, 25 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-265 (TLebo): RL, why? [Ontology] (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: prov-o review / comments (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: prov-o review / comments (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Collections in PROV-O (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Collections in PROV-O (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: New prov-o ontology! (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-259: hadTemporalExtent domain and range [Ontology] (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Collections in PROV-O (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: [prov-o] involvementClass property (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: [prov-o] involvementClass property (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Collections in PROV-O (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Collections in PROV-O (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Collections in PROV-O (Thursday, 23 February)
• [prov-o] involvementClass property (Thursday, 23 February)
• [prov-o] Start vs. StartByActivity (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: Collections in PROV-O (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: ISSUE-135 ... ISSUE-139 (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-138 (collection-collision): Collection does not describe multiple additions/replacements [Data Model] (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-137 (collection-isolation): Collection assertions does not guarantee isolation [Data Model] (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-136 (collection-functional): Collection not stated as functional [Data Model] (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-135 (collection-names): Collection relations have confusing names [Data Model], ISSUE-137, (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-139 (collection-emptylist): Collections don't provide a way to specify empty lists [Data Model] (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-254 (TLebo): rename QualifiedInvolement to Involvement [Ontology] (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Collections in PROV-O (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Making PROV-O OWL-RL compliant (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Updated PROV-O OWL and ProvRDF wiki page (Friday, 17 February)
• Updated PROV-O OWL and ProvRDF wiki page (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: ACTION-55 is reopened (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: Primer actions (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55) (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: PROV ISSUE-206 some possible proposals (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: F2F chat log online? (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: PROV ISSUE-206 some possible proposals (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-233 (paq-dm-and-accounts?): If not in DM, should there be some form of account support in the paq? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-242 (TLebo): generated twice? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-246 (TLebo): add plan example: web page tutorial [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-231 (TLebo): Remove owl:Time from prov-o [Ontology] (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-229 (Refactor-and-sub-edit): Document would benefit from refactoring and editing [prov-dm] (Wednesday, 1 February)

Timothy Lebo

• [owl changed] Re: PROV-ISSUE-256 (TLebo): change namespace of prov-o (Wednesday, 29 February)
• [owl changed] Re: PROV-ISSUE-256 (TLebo): change namespace of prov-o (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: URGENT feedback needed Re: ProvRDF: new mapping markup (Wednesday, 29 February)
• URGENT feedback needed Re: ProvRDF: new mapping markup (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: ProvRDF: new mapping markup (Wednesday, 29 February)
• ProvRDF: new mapping markup (Wednesday, 29 February)
• Re: Collecting PROV examples (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Collecting PROV examples (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Collecting PROV examples (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Collecting PROV examples (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Collecting PROV examples (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: Collecting PROV examples (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-270 (TLebo): automate HTML for OWL constructs [Ontology] (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Collecting PROV examples (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-270 (TLebo): automate HTML for OWL constructs [Ontology] (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: producing HTML documentation of RDFS/OWL (Monday, 27 February)
• producing HTML documentation of RDFS/OWL (Monday, 27 February)
• prov-o meeting today (Monday, 27 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-256 (TLebo): change namespace of prov-o (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Making PROV-O OWL-RL compliant (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-256 (TLebo): change namespace of prov-o (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: prov-o review / comments (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-259: hadTemporalExtent domain and range [Ontology] (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Comments on PROV-O (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-260 (TLebo): In Note section: cite prov:Provenance as better practice to annotate assertions. [prov-dm] (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-257 (TLebo): rename "Account"/"Bundle"/"AccountEntity" to "Provenance" [prov-dm] (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: PROV-DM Simplication Reviewer Feedback... (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: [prov-o] How to express Involvement as as an "Abstract" class in OWL (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Comments on PROV-O (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-188: Section 5.2.3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: [prov-o] involvementClass property (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Collections in PROV-O (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Collections in PROV-O (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-266 (TLebo): RL, why? [Ontology] (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-262 (qualifier-property): entity used entity? [Ontology] (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-262 (qualifier-property): entity used entity? [Ontology] (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: prov-wg: F2F2 Meeting Minutes (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: reviewer feedback on prov-o ontology (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: reviewer feedback on prov-o ontology (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT) (Friday, 24 February)
• resurrecting prov-o components design (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-246 (TLebo): add plan example: web page tutorial [prov-dm] (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-216 (TLebo): qualified wasAttributedTo? [prov-dm] (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-261 (TLebo): alternateOf is not owl:sameAs (rephrase definition) [prov-dm] (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: [prov-o] Start vs. StartByActivity (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: [prov-o] involvementClass property (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: nice reference for qualified (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: nice reference for qualified (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: nice reference for qualified (Thursday, 23 February)
• Review of DM WD4 (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Tim's approach on Involvement (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? (Saturday, 18 February)
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? (Saturday, 18 February)
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? (Saturday, 18 February)
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? (Saturday, 18 February)
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55) (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-253: misc issues with the ontology [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: prov-wg: Another name for Qualified? (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: bootstrapping testcases for prov (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: quick comment on Note in ProvRDF mapping (Sunday, 12 February)
• Re: prov-o team to list left hand sides of DM mapping rules (Sunday, 12 February)
• Re: prov-o team to list left hand sides of DM mapping rules (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: prov-o team to list left hand sides of DM mapping rules (Friday, 10 February)
• prov-o team to list left hand sides of DM mapping rules (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: PROV ISSUE-206 some possible proposals (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: Update Connection TF (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: PROV ISSUE-206 some possible proposals (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-237 (TLebo): Rename Relation to Involvement [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-237 (TLebo): Rename Relation to Involvement [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-237 (TLebo): Rename Relation to Involvement [prov-dm] (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: PROV ISSUE-206 some possible proposals (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-234 (TLebo): id identifies entity, not the record [prov-dm] (Monday, 6 February)
• more fuel for the thing vs. entity fire (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-232 (TLebo): activity start/end: direct time upgrades to instantaneous events [Ontology] (Friday, 3 February)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-231 (TLebo): Remove owl:Time from prov-o [Ontology] (Thursday, 2 February)

Yolanda Gil

• Re: closing issues (Tuesday, 14 February)

Zool0770

• Re: use case agent (Saturday, 18 February)

Last message date: Wednesday, 29 February 2012 22:46:22 UTC