W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > February 2012

Primer actions

From: Simon Miles <simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 11:51:30 +0000
Message-ID: <CAKc1nHeLJr4d3Y_O_fV2ZXLg-1K6DDdxELP4i3_DUkLXELBNzw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hello PROV-O and PROV-DM authors,

I'd like your opinion on where the significant gaps lie between the
primer and the other documents for the coming release.

>From my reading of the ontology, I see the following need updating:

 - wasControlledBy in the primer needs to be replaced by
wasAssociatedWith, wasStartedBy and wasEndedBy
 - old wasDerivedFrom and wasEventuallyDerivedFrom need to be replaced
with new wasDerivedFrom and tracedTo

and the following are not present in the primer at all:

 - actedOnBehalfOf
 - adoptedPlan
 - alternateOf and specializationOf
 - endedAt, startedAt, wasGeneratedAt
 - hadLocation
 - hadOriginalSource, wasQuotedFrom, wasSummaryOf
 - hasAnnotation
 - wasInformedBy

Which of these are uncontroversial and critical enough that they
should be included in the next primer draft?

thanks,
Simon

Dr Simon Miles
Lecturer, Department of Computer Science
Kings College London, WC2R 2LS, UK
+44 (0)20 7848 1166

Modelling the Provenance of Data in Autonomous Systems:
http://eprints.dcs.kcl.ac.uk/1264/

-- 
Dr Simon Miles
Lecturer, Department of Informatics
Kings College London, WC2R 2LS, UK
+44 (0)20 7848 1166

Efficient Multi-Granularity Service Composition:
http://eprints.dcs.kcl.ac.uk/1396/
Received on Thursday, 16 February 2012 11:52:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:56 GMT