W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > February 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-265 (TLebo): RL, why? [Ontology]

From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:56:25 +0000
Message-ID: <CAPRnXtn0=VwQQceA3+_q1TyWxoBxa2-i2UdB1DAzzDzOKbsWcw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu>
Cc: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, public-prov-wg@w3.org
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 18:40, Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu> wrote:
> None of these require OWL-Full, and are well within DL. I haven't had
> trouble reasoning over these sorts of restrictions with data in place.

Well, we can keep it in DL if that still does the job, I just meant
that there would be no OWL profile restrictions on forming those
rules, and that it should be possible to 'retrofit' them like that.

-- 
Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
School of Computer Science
The University of Manchester
Received on Monday, 27 February 2012 13:57:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:56 GMT