W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > February 2012

Re: [prov-o] involvementClass property

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:38:22 -0500
Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <BE7556C1-788F-443A-A3B3-1855D691AAFE@rpi.edu>
To: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Sounds harmless enough. Did you put it into the latest ontology?
I fired up protege and didn't see it.

-Tim

On Feb 23, 2012, at 7:14 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:

> I've suggest a new annotation property in the OWL file: prov:involvementClass.
> 
> 
> +    <owl:AnnotationProperty
> rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#involvementClass">
> +        <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">involvement class</rdfs:label>
> +        <rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">This annotation property links a
> prov:involved subproperty with a prov:Involved subclass. This
> indicates that the property can be qualified by using prov:qualified.
> +
> +Example:
> +    prov:wasGeneratedBy prov:involvementClass prov:Generation .
> +
> +Then this unqualified assertion:
> +    :entity1 prov:wasGeneratedBy :activity1 .
> +
> +can be qualified by adding:
> +   :entity1 prov:qualified :entity1Gen .
> +   :entity1Gen a prov:Generation;
> +       prov:activity :activity1 ;
> +       :customValue 1337 .
> +
> +Note how the range of the unqualified property is mirrored by the
> prov:activity or prov:entity on the involvement class.</rdfs:comment>
> +        <rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="&rdfs;seeAlso"/>
> +    </owl:AnnotationProperty>
> 
> 
> and added this to each of the involved subproperties. (but not
> prov:involved itself - as you should instantiate prov:involved and
> prov:Involvement alone)
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
> School of Computer Science
> The University of Manchester
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2012 14:39:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:56 GMT