W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > February 2012

Re: Tim's approach on Involvement

From: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:08:38 +0000
Message-ID: <EMEW3|fd444d4d2604535600b99ea1eaafc9d7o1L98h08l.moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4F44B096.9030903@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
All, I can no longer load the ontology in Protege. Can you check it's 
all OK?

Luc

On 22/02/2012 09:01, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:46, Khalid Belhajjame
> <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>  wrote:
>
>
>    
>> We decided to model only wasStartedBy that involves an agent. So that I
>> think, we can safely define Start as a sub-class of Association.
>>      
> So something like in http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#Starting_again ?
>
> I'm not sure if I like this - here the involvement is both a
> prov:Start and prov:Inform at the same time - and a phantom agent ?ag1
> is introduced.
>
> .. or we simply say that Starting_again is not mapped to RDF?
>
>    
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2012 09:09:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:56 GMT