- From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 09:24:35 +0000
- To: Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- Cc: W3C provenance WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 08:03, Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk> wrote: > (Towards the end of the second day, Stian made a proposal for some wording > around invariance of provenance, and I'd like to dig it out. It was a > single sentence with a SHOULD, which I think was just enough to alert a > reader that provenance is usefully invariant, without getting into the > philosophical rat-holes that have dogged our earlier discussions. Stian, do > you remember or have a note of your proposal?) I have a log of everything I say on IRC.. used to have so back till 1996 until I made a fatal rm some time in the early 2000s. But RRSAgent beat me to it: http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Chatlog_2012-02-03 15:44:41 <Stian> say: "Attributes on an Entity SHOULD be consistent across all involvements of the entity in other provenance records" 15:45:16 <Stian> s/consistent/true/ or similar (people don't like 'consistent') -- Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team School of Computer Science The University of Manchester
Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2012 09:29:46 UTC