W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > February 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-242 (TLebo): generated twice? [prov-dm]

From: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 11:38:33 +0100
Message-ID: <CAExK0DfFcvqV=baR2HmA7cJqUQz_crNJhsmHegCOaY__5xD5kw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Ok, I've just seen that Stian answered a better detailed response some
hours ago...

2012/2/7 Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>

> Hi Tim,
> this is an interesting question. Right now wasGeneratedBy is functional,
> so you can assert those 2 assertions,
> but it would be inconsistent. However this could bring up problems when
> nesting activities, as in a workflow domain
> (but that's another issue, so I'll leave it out of this thread).
>
> Daniel
>
>
> 2012/2/6 Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
>
>> PROV-ISSUE-242 (TLebo): generated twice? [prov-dm]
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/242
>>
>> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
>> On product: prov-dm
>>
>> Is the following valid?
>>
>> wasGeneratedBy(e,,2001-10-26T21:32:52)
>> wasGeneratedBy(e,,2011-11-27T21:23:34)
>>
>> If no, where does DM say so?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tim
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2012 10:42:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:56 GMT