W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > February 2012

Re: VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT)

From: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:32:44 +0000
Message-ID: <4F4DFECC.8000608@cs.man.ac.uk>
To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
CC: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>

+1
Makes sense to me.
khalid

On 28/02/2012 20:46, Luc Moreau wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Kind reminder for a vote.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Professor Luc Moreau
> Electronics and Computer Science
> University of Southampton
> Southampton SO17 1BJ
> United Kingdom
>
> On 24 Feb 2012, at 00:21, "Luc Moreau"<L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>  wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Today, we have agreed [1] to reorganize the PROV-DM deliverable in three separate documents:
>>
>> PROV-DM: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html
>> PROV-DM-CONSTRAINTS: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm-constraints.html
>> PROV-ASN: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-asn.html
>>
>> As part of the reorganization, we dropped the notion of 'record', the notion of 'account record', the
>> idea of 'nested account records', and associated idea of scope, in the spirit of simplification discussed
>> at F2F2.
>>
>> Given this, we propose to close all issues related to identifiers, namely:
>>
>> - ISSUE-145,
>> - ISSUE-183,
>> - ISSUE-215,
>> - ISSUE-225 and
>> - ISSUE-234
>>
>> Can you express your support in the usual way, or continue the discussion for the respective issues.
>> (Please cast a vote for each issue).
>>
>> Deadline: deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT
>>
>> Regards,
>> Luc
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/meeting/2012-02-23#resolution_2
>
Received on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 10:33:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:57 GMT