- From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:31:17 +0000
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:35, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: >> - alternateOf and specializationOf > ok, though we don't have agreement on symmetry/transitivity i believe I think it might be dangerous to go too deep on this in the primer - but on the other hand it is something we would otherwise get many question about (or applications would simply ignore). >> - endedAt, startedAt, wasGeneratedAt > caution with time, given Ivan's comment Why? We can make our primer match what we currently have in PROV-DM and PROV-O. It's quite essential for provenance to be able to talk about *when* something happened, so I believe these should all be in. -- Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team School of Computer Science The University of Manchester
Received on Friday, 17 February 2012 09:32:08 UTC