Re: prov-o team to list left hand sides of DM mapping rules

Thanks Tim and Daniel!

I have slightly modified the Agent signature (removed prov:type ns:Type
since it is not in the DM signature) and also added issue for Activity.

Thanks.

Best,
Satya

On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote:

> Thanks, Daniel!
>
> I'll dig in later this afternoon.
>
> Could the rest of the prov-o team sign
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#Mapping_coverage
> after they've reviewed the list?
>
> Also, please feel free to take a stab at right hands, or make notes under
> each rule.
>
> Thanks,
> Tim
>
>
>
> On Feb 10, 2012, at 11:29 AM, Daniel Garijo wrote:
>
> Done.
>
> Daniel
>
> 2012/2/10 Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
>
>> Thank you, Daniel.
>>
>> I look forward to reviewing what you've done.
>>
>> I know you've also created the lists
>>
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#List_of_terms_that_are_going_to_be_modeled_in_order_to_align_PROV-O_to_WD3
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#List_of_terms_that_are_NOT_going_to_be_modeled_in_PROV-O_to_WD3__alignement
>>
>> Can you move each classification here down next to the rule?
>>
>> So, instead of saying "We won't do wasEndedBy and Account", this rule
>> page will have that mentioned in each section:
>>
>> == Account ===
>>
>> DM => PROVO
>>
>> We will not do this mapping yet.
>>
>> == wasEndedBy ===
>>
>> DM => PROVO
>>
>> We will not do this mapping yet.
>>
>>
>>
>> I think it's best if we stay DM-centric so that we can stay oriented.
>>
>> Also, I'd like to get rid of the lists at the top when their information
>> has made it to the appropriate sections.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tim
>>
>>
>> On Feb 10, 2012, at 10:50 AM, Daniel Garijo wrote:
>>
>> Hi Tim,
>> I've completed the left list (in order), and I've also completed the
>> actedOnBehalfOf according
>> to what was discussed on the mailing list.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>> 2012/2/10 Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
>>
>>> prov-o team,
>>>
>>> We agreed to have a complete list of "left hand sides" listed at [1] by
>>> today.
>>>
>>> It is still incomplete.
>>>
>>> This is mostly a copy-paste activity. The heavy lifting comes in filling
>>> in the right hand sides.
>>>
>>> The purpose of our goal today was to extract _all_ of the DM ASN
>>> signatures so that we had a concise view of the work ahead of us.
>>> I've argued before (and heard some agreement) that we maintain the order
>>> of the rules to suit the original order in the DM.
>>>
>>> I have about 10 done, and I think someone did the Derivation.
>>>
>>> Can we get more eyes on copy/pasting the signatures from DM into left
>>> hand sides of these rules?
>>>
>>> If the pattern is not obvious from the 11 rules that are already there,
>>> please ask for clarification.
>>>
>>>
>>> I will work on the list this afternoon, but won't be able to get back to
>>> it until Sunday afternoon.
>>>
>>> Thanks for your consideration.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Tim
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [1]  http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>