Hi Tim, Related to this is sharing the prov namespace for all the specifications. There is a separate issue on the tracker. We don't know yet how to do it, so I think it's too premature to close. Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science University of Southampton Southampton SO17 1BJ United Kingdom On 24 Feb 2012, at 06:31, "Timothy Lebo" <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote: > namespace changed. > > pending review due to no objections. > > Chairs, please let me know if it's premature to close. > > -Tim > > On Feb 20, 2012, at 3:43 PM, Graham Klyne wrote: > >> +1 >> >> #g >> >> On 20/02/2012 20:30, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >>> PROV-ISSUE-256 (TLebo): change namespace of prov-o >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/256 >>> >>> Raised by: Timothy Lebo >>> On product: >>> >>> from >>> http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o/ >>> to >>> http://www.w3.org/ns/prov# >>> >>> based on discussions at F2F and to align naming patterns used in other recent W3C namespaces (e.g. http://www.w3.org/ns/sparql-service-description#, http://www.w3.org/ns/dcat#) >>> >>> -Tim >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > >Received on Friday, 24 February 2012 06:36:35 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:56 GMT