- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:40:13 -0500
- To: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org
On Feb 23, 2012, at 7:04 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > Referring to discussion about wasStartedBy() I've resolved this for > now by splitting this into two properties and classes: > > prov:wasStartedBy - range prov:Agent (mirrors prov:wasEndedBy) > > prov:wasStartedByActivity - range prov:Activity > > prov:StartByActivity - subclass of ActivityInvolvement > prov:Start - subclass of prov:Association (mirrors prov:Start) > > See http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#Started_by_activity and > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#Starting I think this is a great normalization of the confusion we've been facing. Thanks! > > > Luc has indicated that wasStartedBy/wasEndedBy are at risk. If they > disappear, we can remove 'by activity' from the remaining > property/class. I've seen conflicting claims of which is on the chopping block. But we don't need to worry about that from a mapping perspective, as you've so nicely resolved it. -Tim
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2012 14:40:51 UTC