W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > February 2012

Re: Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55)

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:08:41 -0500
Cc: <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <66AD7939-6821-4C6A-9206-9E0292608ED5@rpi.edu>
To: Curt Tilmes <Curt.Tilmes@nasa.gov>
Added example to 

http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/PROV_OWL_ontology_component_examples#The_MonaLisa_portrait_is_dated_to_circa_1503.E2.80.931519

-tim


On Feb 17, 2012, at 9:25 AM, Curt Tilmes wrote:

> On 02/16/2012 05:04 PM, Luc Moreau wrote:
>> On 16/02/12 21:36, Satya Sahoo wrote:
>>> Also, I believe the DM supports representation of a simple provenance
>>> assertion such as, "The MonaLisa portrait is dated to circa 15031519"
>>> (MonaLisa portrait is an Entity).
>> 
>> How would you do it? I don't know.
> 
> Time is instantaneous, so you couldn't specify it as a generation
> time, but could you just define a domain specific attribute for the
> generation?
> 
> wasGeneratedBy(ex:MonaLisa, [ex:creationEstimate="1503-1519"]);
> 
> Is it ok to leave out both activity and time in order to specify
> generation attributes?  DM would seem to allow it since everything but
> entity is optional.
> 
> 
> How would such a thing get mapped to RDF?
> 
> ex:MonaLisa a prov:Entity .
> _:a a prov:Activity .
> _:g a prov:Generation .
> ex:MonaLisa prov:wasGeneratedBy _:a .
> _:a prov:hadQualifiedGeneration _:g .
> _:g a prov:QualifiedInvolvement .
> _:g prov:hadQualifiedEntity ex:MonaLisa .
> _:g ex:creationEstimate "1503-1519" .
> 
> 
> Probably easier to just express this outside PROV:
> 
> ex:MonaLisa ex:creationEstimate "1503-1519" .
> 
> Curt
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 17 February 2012 15:09:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:56 GMT