Re: Update on PROV-O OWL file (Action item 55)

Added example to 

http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/PROV_OWL_ontology_component_examples#The_MonaLisa_portrait_is_dated_to_circa_1503.E2.80.931519

-tim


On Feb 17, 2012, at 9:25 AM, Curt Tilmes wrote:

> On 02/16/2012 05:04 PM, Luc Moreau wrote:
>> On 16/02/12 21:36, Satya Sahoo wrote:
>>> Also, I believe the DM supports representation of a simple provenance
>>> assertion such as, "The MonaLisa portrait is dated to circa 1503–1519"
>>> (MonaLisa portrait is an Entity).
>> 
>> How would you do it? I don't know.
> 
> Time is instantaneous, so you couldn't specify it as a generation
> time, but could you just define a domain specific attribute for the
> generation?
> 
> wasGeneratedBy(ex:MonaLisa, [ex:creationEstimate="1503-1519"]);
> 
> Is it ok to leave out both activity and time in order to specify
> generation attributes?  DM would seem to allow it since everything but
> entity is optional.
> 
> 
> How would such a thing get mapped to RDF?
> 
> ex:MonaLisa a prov:Entity .
> _:a a prov:Activity .
> _:g a prov:Generation .
> ex:MonaLisa prov:wasGeneratedBy _:a .
> _:a prov:hadQualifiedGeneration _:g .
> _:g a prov:QualifiedInvolvement .
> _:g prov:hadQualifiedEntity ex:MonaLisa .
> _:g ex:creationEstimate "1503-1519" .
> 
> 
> Probably easier to just express this outside PROV:
> 
> ex:MonaLisa ex:creationEstimate "1503-1519" .
> 
> Curt
> 
> 

Received on Friday, 17 February 2012 15:09:12 UTC