W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > February 2012

Re: prov-o team to list left hand sides of DM mapping rules

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:07:04 -0500
Cc: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>, "public-prov-wg@w3.org Group" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <12F34B19-F883-4880-9BD7-F78D8B6C8A01@rpi.edu>
To: Satya Sahoo <satya.sahoo@case.edu>
Good catch, Satya.

This is why we need multiple eyeballs :-)

-Tim


On Feb 11, 2012, at 8:03 PM, Satya Sahoo wrote:

> Thanks Tim and Daniel!
> 
> I have slightly modified the Agent signature (removed prov:type ns:Type since it is not in the DM signature) and also added issue for Activity.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Best,
> Satya
> 
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote:
> Thanks, Daniel!
> 
> I'll dig in later this afternoon.
> 
> Could the rest of the prov-o team sign http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#Mapping_coverage
> after they've reviewed the list?
> 
> Also, please feel free to take a stab at right hands, or make notes under each rule.
> 
> Thanks,
> Tim
> 
> 
> 
> On Feb 10, 2012, at 11:29 AM, Daniel Garijo wrote:
> 
>> Done.
>> 
>> Daniel
>> 
>> 2012/2/10 Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
>> Thank you, Daniel.
>> 
>> I look forward to reviewing what you've done.
>> 
>> I know you've also created the lists
>> 
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#List_of_terms_that_are_going_to_be_modeled_in_order_to_align_PROV-O_to_WD3
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#List_of_terms_that_are_NOT_going_to_be_modeled_in_PROV-O_to_WD3__alignement
>> 
>> Can you move each classification here down next to the rule?
>> 
>> So, instead of saying "We won't do wasEndedBy and Account", this rule page will have that mentioned in each section:
>> 
>> == Account ===
>> 
>> DM => PROVO
>> 
>> We will not do this mapping yet.
>> 
>> == wasEndedBy ===
>> 
>> DM => PROVO
>> 
>> We will not do this mapping yet.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> I think it's best if we stay DM-centric so that we can stay oriented.
>> 
>> Also, I'd like to get rid of the lists at the top when their information has made it to the appropriate sections.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Tim
>> 
>> 
>> On Feb 10, 2012, at 10:50 AM, Daniel Garijo wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Tim,
>>> I've completed the left list (in order), and I've also completed the actedOnBehalfOf according
>>> to what was discussed on the mailing list.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Daniel
>>> 
>>> 2012/2/10 Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
>>> prov-o team,
>>> 
>>> We agreed to have a complete list of "left hand sides" listed at [1] by today.
>>> 
>>> It is still incomplete.
>>> 
>>> This is mostly a copy-paste activity. The heavy lifting comes in filling in the right hand sides.
>>> 
>>> The purpose of our goal today was to extract _all_ of the DM ASN signatures so that we had a concise view of the work ahead of us.
>>> I've argued before (and heard some agreement) that we maintain the order of the rules to suit the original order in the DM.
>>> 
>>> I have about 10 done, and I think someone did the Derivation.
>>> 
>>> Can we get more eyes on copy/pasting the signatures from DM into left hand sides of these rules?
>>> 
>>> If the pattern is not obvious from the 11 rules that are already there, please ask for clarification.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I will work on the list this afternoon, but won't be able to get back to it until Sunday afternoon.
>>> 
>>> Thanks for your consideration.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Tim
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> [1]  http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
Received on Sunday, 12 February 2012 19:11:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:56 GMT