W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > February 2012

Re: Provenance model, syntax and formal properties

From: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:43:26 +0100
Message-ID: <EMEW3|bd847229166ad204663271ac11f14e10o1RIhW08l.moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4F4D204E.70103@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu>
CC: Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>, W3C provenance WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Thanks Jim,
This is now ISSUE-273.

Luc

On 28/02/2012 19:06, Jim McCusker wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk 
> <mailto:L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Graham
>
>     A quick answer to two of your points;
>     - the ASN acronym has been bothering me for a while.
>      Indeed, it's a notation, not an abstract syntax.
>      I am open to suggestion, I suggest I raise an issue to debate the
>     name.
>
>
> Feel free to take credit/raise the issue, but how about Provenance 
> Notation (PROV-N)? Since it's parseable and inter-convertable, it's 
> not abstract. It's just a domain-specific language for provenance.
>
> Jim
> -- 
> Jim McCusker
> Programmer Analyst
> Krauthammer Lab, Pathology Informatics
> Yale School of Medicine
> james.mccusker@yale.edu <mailto:james.mccusker@yale.edu> | (203) 
> 785-6330 <tel:%28203%29%20785-6330>
> http://krauthammerlab.med.yale.edu
>
> PhD Student
> Tetherless World Constellation
> Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
> mccusj@cs.rpi.edu <mailto:mccusj@cs.rpi.edu>
> http://tw.rpi.edu
Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2012 18:44:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:57 GMT